TABLE 2.
Min | Max | Meana | SD | 95% CI | Test-retest reliability (N = 35) | ||||||
|
|||||||||||
ICC | 95 % CI | p | |||||||||
I. Coercion as offending subscale | |||||||||||
3 | Use of coercion can harm the therapeutic relationship | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.75 | 0.90 | 3.64 | 3.86 | 0.600 | 0.331 | 0.778 | <0.001 |
4 | Use of coercion is a declaration of failure on the part of the mental health services | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.20 | 0.87 | 2.09 | 2.30 | 0.439 | 0.123 | 0.673 | 0.004 |
8 | Coercion violates the patients integrity | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.70 | 1.00 | 3.58 | 3.82 | 0.512 | 0.216 | 0.721 | 0.001 |
13 | Too much coercion is used in treatment | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.44 | 0.90 | 2.33 | 2.55 | 0.370 | 0.042 | 0.625 | 0.014 |
14 | Scarce resources lead to more use of coercion | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.42 | 1.04 | 3.29 | 3.54 | 0.464 | 0.168 | 0.686 | 0.001 |
15 | Coercion could have been much reduced, giving more time and personal contact | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.46 | 0.98 | 3.34 | 3.58 | 0.371 | 0.043 | 0.626 | 0.014 |
Mean | 1.50 | 5.00 | 3.16 | 0.54 | 3.10 | 3.23 | 0.563 | 0.293 | 0.751 | <0.001 | |
II. Coercion as care and security subscale | |||||||||||
1 | Use of coercion is necessary as protection in dangerous situations | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.02 | 0.69 | 3.93 | 4.10 | 0.666 | 0.435 | 0.815 | <0.001 |
2 | For security reasons coercion must sometimes be used | 1.00 | 5.00 | 4.05 | 0.68 | 3.96 | 4.13 | 0.735 | 0.534 | 0.857 | <0.001 |
5 | Coercion may represent care and protection | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.57 | 0.88 | 3.47 | 3.68 | 0.625 | 0.376 | 0.790 | <0.001 |
7 | Coercion may prevent the development of a dangerous situation | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.67 | 0.84 | 3.56 | 3.77 | 0.599 | 0.334 | 0.776 | <0.001 |
9 | For severely ill patients coercion may represent safety | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.62 | 0.89 | 3.51 | 3.73 | 0.550 | 0.273 | 0.744 | <0.001 |
11 | Use of coercion is necessary toward dangerous and aggressive patients | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.44 | 0.91 | 3.33 | 3.56 | 0.572 | 0.301 | 0.758 | <0.001 |
Mean | 1.00 | 5.00 | 3.73 | 0.58 | 3.66 | 3.80 | 0.832 | 0.691 | 0.912 | <0.001 | |
III Coercion as treatment subscale | |||||||||||
6 | More coercion should be used in treatment | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.07 | 0.87 | 1.96 | 2.18 | 0.275 | −0.068 | 0.557 | 0.056 |
10 | Patients without insight require use of coercion | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.42 | 0.96 | 2.30 | 2.54 | 0.642 | 0.401 | 0.801 | <0.001 |
12 | Regressive patients require use of coercion | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.29 | 0.83 | 2.19 | 2.39 | 0.615 | 0.364 | 0.784 | <0.001 |
Mean | 1.00 | 5.00 | 2.26 | 0.71 | 2.17 | 2.35 | 0.646 | 0.407 | 0.803 | <0.001 | |
Total of the 15 itemsb | 1.80 | 4.47 | 3.08 | 0.43 | 3.03 | 3.13 | 0.738 | 0.540 | 0.859 | <0.001 |
aScore range: 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). bScores in the subscale I were reversed. The bold values are the summary scores of each subscale.