Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 23;15:e00210. doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2022.e00210

Table 1.

Comparison of isobutanol production strategies.

Host Cell Substrate Titer (g/L) Yield (%) Productivity (g/[Lah]) Reference
In vivo
C. thermocellum Cellulose 5.4 41 0.072 Lin et al. (2015)
G. thermoglucosidqsius Glucose 3.3 22 0.069 Lin et al. (2014)
Cellobiose 0.6 8 0.013
R. eutropha Fructose 0.2 5 0.0028 Black et al. (2018)
S. cerevisiae Glucose 0.635 2 0.013 Avalos et al. (2013)
In vitro
Free in solution Glucose 0.76 53 0.032 Guterl et al. (2012)
Free in solution Glucose 275 95 4 Sherkhanov et al. (2020)
Partially immobilizeda Keto acid 2.59 54 0.11 Grimaldi et al. (2016b)
Epoxy immobilized Keto acid 2 43 0.083 Wong et al. (2019)
in vivo to in vitro Keto acid 1.78 93 0.074 This work
a

Reaction was partially immobilized: ADHWT and MBP-KIVDWT immobilized, FDHWT free in solution.