Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;34:404–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.10.001

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

a. Forest plot of the mean difference in acetabular cup anteversion error (in degrees) for PSI versus SI (control). Mean difference favored PSI (MD = −6.25, p = 0.04). There was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 98%; p < 0.00001). b. Forest plot of the mean difference in acetabular cup inclination error (in degrees) for PSI versus SI (control). Mean difference favored PSI (MD = −4.00, p = 0.0002). There was considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 85%; p < 0.0001).