Table 3.

Multiple group regression analysis examining coping strategies as predictors of wellbeing.

Predictor Variable	Wellbeing
	Phase 1 (n = 2541)		Phase 2 (n = 2759)		Phase 1 vs. Phase 2 Comparison (n = 5300)
	b	β	b	β	p-Value
Active coping	0.324 **	0.146 **	0.118 *	0.058 *	0.005
Planning	−0.192 **	−0.094 **	−0.102 *	−0.055 *	0.192
Positive reframing	0.283 **	0.128 **	0.171 **	0.084 **	0.096
Acceptance	0.198 **	0.079 **	0.251 **	0.113 **	0.430
Use of emotional support	0.254 **	0.126 **	0.375 **	0.198 **	0.038
Use of instrumental support	−0.040	−0.019	−0.031	−0.016 (0.432)	0.880
Venting	−0.230 **	−0.090 **	−0.166 **	−0.080 **	0.288
Substance use	−0.131 **	−0.051 *	−0.087 *	−0.038 *	0.412
Behavioural disengagement	−0.265 **	−0.087 **	−0.289 **	−0.118 **	0.734
Self-blame	−0.603 **	−0.270 *	−0.529 **	−0.285 **	0.154
Family–work segmentation	−0.084	−0.021	−0.296 **	−0.080 **	0.044
Work–family segmentation	0.140 *	0.042 *	0.157 *	0.050 *	0.848
Working to improve skills/efficiency	0.334 **	0.098 **	0.362 **	0.116 **	0.745
Recreation and relaxation	0.154 *	0.052 *	0.189 **	0.069 **	0.670
Exercise	0.152 *	0.057 *	0.105 *	0.044 *	0.476

Note. b = unstandardised estimate; β = standardised estimate. All analyses controlled for participants’ sex, age, ethnic background, country of work, occupational group, number of years of work experience and disability status (* p < 0.005, ** p < 0.001).