Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;10(5):e2200023. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00023

TABLE 2.

Key Findings From Assessment of Potential for Institutionalization

Approach Immediate PPFP Predischarge Targeted Home Visits KMC/SCANU PPFP/EPI Integration
Service delivery (System 1)
  • Most providers trained in PPFP and provide integrated services; few upskilling needsa

  • Most providers trained in PPFP and provide integrated services; few upskilling needsa

  • Limited observation and discussion during busy discharge timesb

  • Increased workloadb

  • FWA JDs included HVsa

  • High FWA vacancies, infeasible HV targetsb

  • Nurses in KMC/SCANU not trained in PPFPb

  • No integration by EPI or FP providersb

  • Negative impact on provider workloadb

  • Facility infrastructure unconducive to private FP counselingb

Coordination
(System 2)
  • Existing monthly coordination meetingsa

  • Needed coordination of counseling beginning from ANC, documenting and following up on clients’ PPFP intentionsb

  • Existing coordination meetingsa

  • Poor referral coordinationb

  • Needed internal coordination during busy discharge times, support for additional tasksb

  • Existing coordination meeting of supervisors, service providers, and FWAsa

  • Needed coordination of facility referralsb

  • No existing coordination or referrals between KMC/SCANU and FP unitsb

  • Needed coordination to ensure FP providers present in EPI sessionsb

  • Needed coordination of intra- and inter-facility referralsb

Supervision, management, oversight, control (System 3)
  • Existing supervision mechanismsa

  • Monthly supervision visits planneda

  • Little follow-up after supervisionb

  • Monthly supervision visits planneda

  • Little supportive supervision, HVs rarely observedb

  • Monthly supervision visits planneda

  • PPFP not included in provider supervisionb

  • Integrated services not included in supervisionb

Higher-level systems (System 4)
  • National stakeholder commitment to PPIUDa

  • Existing (underutilized) fund to offset PPFP expensesa,b

  • Different managers in KMC/SCANU and FP units, increasing coordination needsb

  • Stakeholder commitment to FP/EPI integrationa

Support systems/supply chain
  • FP commodity supply generally sufficienta

  • FP commodities would need to be supplied in unitsb

Support systems/information systems
  • Existing processes to counsel and document PPFP preferences in ANC carda

  • Inconsistent documentation of PPFP preferences in ANCb

  • FTMs identifiable in delivery, MNC registersa

  • No system of documenting status at dischargeb

  • FTMs identifiable in community pregnancy registration systemsa

  • No mechanism prompted FWA HV after deliveryb

  • FTMs not identifiable in KMC/SCANU registersb

  • FTMs identifiable in EPI registers or screeninga

  • EPI and FP registers not linked or harmonizedb

Decision
  • Combined as final selected approaches, with risk mitigation efforts

  • Determined to have deal-breakers in the context

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; EPI, Expanded Programme on Immunization; FP, family planning; FTM, first-time mother; FWA, family welfare assistant; HV, home visit; JD, job description; KMC, kangaroo mother care; MNC, maternal and newborn care; PPFP, postpartum family planning; PPIUD, postpartum intrauterine device; SCANU, Special Care Newborn Unit.

aDenotes opportunities.

bDenotes potential risks to viability based on current system characteristics.