Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;16:928522. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.928522

Table 1.

A change of personality concept to integrate the subject's experiential mode of information processing.

(1) Classical dual concept of personality posits two information processing systems in humans: a rationale and an experiential one.
(2) The dilemma of classical cognitive science is: Subjective experience is not accessible to other observers whereas perception of objects and processes are accessible.
(3) The subject exhibits two modes of consciousness: a non-reflective (i.e., a 1st first person perspective) and a reflective (i.e., a 3rd person perspective, ownership of experience).
(4) A probabilistic model posits: the metaphysical self (“I,” the subject of experience) vs. the phenomenal self (“me,” the object of experience).
(5) A practical approach for a science of consciousness: exact describing the phenomenal-self according to a reflective, methodically guided phenomenological analysis.
(6) Mindfulness and believing interact with living experience and are mutually antagonistic (principle of subjective detachment vs. principle of subjective evaluation).
(7) Here the objectives of the assessment of mental processes are: to differentiate between the manifestations and mechanisms of unconscious EES, conscious EPS and NS.

Searle (1994), Epstein (2003), Gallagher and Varela (2003), Vago and Silbersweig (2012), Chalmers (2013), Choifer (2018), Metzinger (2018), and Wozniak (2018).