Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov;12(11):5209–5221. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1208

Table 4. Comparison of quantitative TIC parameters of heterogeneous hypo-enhancement and homogeneous hyper/iso-enhancement between thyroid inflammatory nodules and papillary carcinoma.

Parameters Heterogeneous hypo-enhancement Homogeneous hyper/iso-enhancement
Inflammatory nodules Papillary carcinoma P value Inflammatory nodules Papillary carcinoma P value
PI 51.15 (38.82, 58.78) 81.3 (73.15, 92.46) <0.001* 73.18 (63.74, 87.34) 90.71 (84.50, 105.87) 0.003*
RT (s) 5.03 (4.00, 8.11) 4.36 (3.25, 7.19) 0.962 4.54 (3.98, 6.20) 5.10 (3.72, 11.79) 0.129
TTP (s) 6.43 (4.64, 9.35) 4.97 (3.67, 8.19) 0.854 5.58 (4.54, 6.90) 6.22 (4.18, 12.69) 0.100
AS 17.95 (10.27, 23.21) 32.09 (15.58, 51.40) 0.016* 29.83 (23.11, 38.23) 35.75 (12.76, 51.00) 0.501
DS −2.92 (−4.76, −1.47) −3.81 (−7.89, −2.14) 0.595 −4.97 (−8.03, −2.31) −4.90 (−10.69, −1.93) 0.567

The data was presented as median (interquartile range). *P<0.05 were considered as significant difference. TIC, time-intensity curve; PI, peak intensity; RT, rise time; TTP, time to peak; AS, the maximum slope rate of ascending curve; DS, the maximum slope rate of descending curve.