Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;13:6379. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34049-3

Table 1.

Estimated mean ± 95% confidence interval (CI) for fluxes of the surface energy budget (SEB) and vegetation type effect significance across summer (JJA) and the annual timescale (Y)

Season Surface energy flux Mean estimate ± 95% CI for surface energy flux magnitudes in W m−2 for each vegetation type (Mean estimate ± 95% CI for normalized magnitudes in % of maximum potential incoming shortwave radiation) Effect significance
Boreal peat bog Wetland complex Graminoid Erect-shrub Prostrate-shrub Barren complex Glacier Vegetation type
JJA Rnet 135 ± 37 (17 ± 5%) 103 ± 35 (14 ± 4%) 100 ± 34 (13 ± 4%) 102 ± 41 (13 ± 5%) 91 ± 44 (13 ± 6%) - 51 ± 49 (6 ± 6%) F5,23 = 2.1 n.s.
H 7 ± 40 (1 ± 6%) 34 ± 36 (5 ± 5%) 26 ± 36 (3 ± 5%) 38 ± 37 (5 ± 5%) 39 ± 36 (6 ± 5%) −18 ± 32 (−2 ± 5%) −24 ± 18 (−3 ± 3%) F6,20 = 3.6*
LE 75 ± 26 (9 ± 3%) 32 ± 22 (5 ± 2%) 47 ± 23 (5 ± 2%) 25 ± 26 (4 ± 3%) 24 ± 23 (4 ± 2%) 0 ± 20 (0 ± 2%) 8 ± 15 (1 ± 2%) F6,10 = 5.2*
G 5 ± 6 (1 ± 1%) 11 ± 7 (2 ± 1%) 11 ± 6 (1 ± 1%) 16 ± 7 (2 ± 1%) 11 ± 8 (1 ± 1%) - 5 ± 7 (1 ± 1%) F5,5 = 2.4 n.s.
SWnet 190 ± 36 (23 ± 5%) 156 ± 34 (21 ± 4%) 154 ± 32 (20 ± 4%) 137 ± 45 (18 ± 6%) 154 ± 41 (21 ± 5%) - 87 ± 49 (10 ± 7%) F5,22 = 3.3*
LWnet −51 ± 19 (−6 ± 3%) −39 ± 19 (−5 ± 3%) −49 ± 18 (−6 ± 3%) −29 ± 21 (−4 ± 3%) −38 ± 24 (−6 ± 3%) −71 ± 17 (−9 ± 2%) −36 ± 16 (−4 ± 2%) F6,15 = 5.5**
Y Rnet 31 ± 17 (3 ± 2%) 24 ± 19 (1 ± 3%) 30 ± 19 (5 ± 2%) - 11 ± 21 (0 ± 3%) - 4 ± 20 (0 ± 2%) F4,13 = 3.8*
H - −1 ± 31 - - −8 ± 31 −13 ± 22 −25 ± 13 -
LE - - - - - - - -
G 1 ± 2 (0 ± 0%) 0 ± 2 (0 ± 0%) 1 ± 2 (0 ± 0%) 1 ± 3 1 ± 2 (0 ± 0%) - −1 ± 2 (0 ± 0%) F5,−3 = 0.0 n.s.
SWnet 63 ± 23 (9 ± 5%) 60 ± 23 (8 ± 7%) 55 ± 21 (9 ± 7%) - 54 ± 23 (7 ± 7%) - 34 ± 27 (4 ± 5%) F4,10 = 1.3 n.s.
LWnet −35 ± 14 (−6 ± 3%) −29 ± 14 (−6 ± 3%) −27 ± 14 (−5 ± 3%) −25 ± 17 −32 ± 17 −40 ± 12 (−7 ± 2%) −31 ± 10 (−5 ± 2%) F6,13 = 1.2 n.s.

Mean estimates ± 95% CI (Wm−2) are derived from a mixed-model analysis with seasonally aggregated SEB-data (nr. of sites: 64, nr. of site years: 652, period: 1994–2021). Surface energy fluxes: Rnet net radiation, H sensible heat flux, LE latent heat flux, G ground heat flux, SWnet net shortwave radiation, LWnet net longwave radiation. Effect significance is derived from ANOVA (F-value, P-value: ***P < 0.001, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, n.s. not significant). Estimates for normalized surface energy fluxes (i.e., percentage of maximum potential incoming shortwave radiation) are indicated in parentheses. Note: flux direction convention is positive away from the surface for heat fluxes (i.e. H, LE and G). Effect significance is not shown where 3 or more vegetation types are missing. See Supplementary Table 4 for significant pairwise differences among vegetation types and Supplementary Table 5 for a more detailed analysis of normalized surface energy fluxes across the summer months.