Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;12(10):146. doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00741-2

Table 4.

Cox proportional hazards model for Grade ≥2 CRS in lymphoma cohort.

Variable Univariate analysisa Multivariate analysis
HR Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P value* HR Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P value*
Age at CAR Tb 1.002 0.986 1.018 0.8
Sex (male) 0.76 0.49 1.16 0.2
CAR T construct (axi-cel) 4.67 1.71 12.75 <0.01* 3.48 1.12 10.84 0.03*
ECOG ≥ 1 1.40 0.91 2.15 0.1
Lines of therapy prior to CAR Tb 0.908 0.780 1.056 0.2
Bridging therapy prior to CAR T 0.64 0.41 1.03 0.06 0.75 0.45 1.25 0.3
Time from diagnosis to CAR T (months)b 0.999 0.995 1.004 0.7
ANCb 1.049 0.992 1.109 0.09 1.017 0.955 1.083 0.6
Hemoglobinb 0.945 0.845 1.058 0.3
Plateletsb 1.003 1.000 1.005 0.03* 1.002 1.000 1.004 0.04*
LDHb 1.001 1.000 1.002 0.01* 1.002 1.001 1.002 <0.01*
Albuminb 0.709 0.462 1.089 0.1
Prophylactic G-CSFc 3.31 1.75 6.24 <0.01* 2.15 1.11 4.18 0.02*

*P < 0.05, indicating statistical significance in univariate or multivariate models, is denoted by asterisks.

aVariables with P < 0.10 in Cox univariate proportional hazards model were included in the multivariate model.

bContinuous hazard ratio (per unit change in regressor).

cProphylactic G-CSF refers to exposure to G-CSF prior to CAR T cell infusion.