Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;12:18283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22425-4

Table 2.

Results of linear mixed effects models using factor scores from the first two principal components of PCA to test for differences in uropygial gland microbiota among free-living and captive song sparrows, using bird ID as a random effect to account for birds that were sampled twice: an initial (free-living) sample collected on the day of capture and a captive sample collected after approx. 11 months in captivity (see Table S3 for factor loadings).

Estimate SE t F p
PC1
Fixed effects
 Intercept − 6.3 0.9 − 7.1
 State (free-living, captive) 13.1 1.2 10.6 113.3 < 0.0001
Variance SD
PC1
Random effects
 Bird ID 2.8 1.7
 Residuals 25.9 5.1
Estimate SE t F p
PC2
Fixed effects
 Intercept 2.4 0.7 3.3
 State (free-living, captive) − 5.1 1.1 − 4.7 22.1 < 0.0001
Variance SD
PC2
Random effects
 Bird ID 0.0 0.0
 Residuals 20.8 4.6