These are challenging times for the United States (U.S.). The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed existing inequities in federal, state, and local public health infrastructures. The continuous gun violence, attacks on reproductive rights and abortion access, and ongoing pandemics have contributed to an overall sense of insecurity, anxiety, and despair. The school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, is one of the latest national tragedies and a stark reminder of how little the U.S. has prioritized the health, safety, and well-being of its most purposively marginalized citizens, including children. This senseless violence, coupled with the long overdue COVID-19 vaccine for children and infants five years of age or younger, and current infant formula shortage are further evidence of this fact.
All of these unfortunate incidents are reproductive justice issues. One of the tenets of reproductive justice states that all families have the right to parent their children in a safe and healthy environment.1 For most, the current environments are not safe or healthy. This is particularly true when the infant formula shortage is examined.
The infant formula shortage is an ongoing structural issue that has been exacerbated during the pandemic.2 Instead of discussing and addressing these systemic and structural issues, the infant formula shortage quickly devolved into a breastfeeding-versus-formula-feeding battle. The negative discourse between breastfeeding and formula supporters across social media platforms reinforced parenting wars, defensiveness, guilt, and shame while taking attention off the true culprits: the lack of policies and practices3 (e.g. paid parental leave, workplace lactation accommodations, Baby-Friendly Hospitals, Medicaid expansion, and greater federal oversight of infant formula production, safety,4 and unethical marketing practices5) that prioritize capitalistic goals and corporate profits over human milk feeding and the health and wellbeing of birthing and lactating parents.
This is not the first infant formula shortage the U.S. has faced in recent memory.2 For many low wage earning families, securing the necessary formula needed to nourish their infants and children has been a constant struggle, as many live in communities burdened by food apartheid.6 Food apartheid speaks to the way racism and discrimination are operationalized to perpetuate harmful policies, such as racial and economic segregation, that have limited access to high quality foods in some rural and urban communities.6 Some may forget that just two and half years ago, at the beginning of the pandemic, access to infant formula was very limited.7 Panic buying and hoarding of household staples was not limited to toilet paper. Infant formula was also in high demand. The difference between the early days of the pandemic and now is that the families most impacted at that time were communities of color and those without the financial means or space to store items in bulk. Now that white, middle-income, and more affluent families are affected, the inaccessibility of formula is considered a national crisis.
It is worth noting that many of those sharing their infant feeding experiences online started with breastfeeding or pumping expressed milk. Though the maternal and infant health benefits associated with breastfeeding are well known,8,9 the fact that most families currently using infant formula started with breastfeeding or pumping expressed milk is left out of the discussion. The U.S. data are clear, pregnant women want to breastfeed or provide human milk to their infants after birth.10 However, most encounter significant barriers beyond their control that make achieving their breastfeeding goals very difficult, thus increasing reliance on infant formula.11,12 Barriers such as limited access to lactation education and skilled lactation support providers, poor access to donor human milk, inadequate paid family leave,13 and lack of lactation accommodations when returning to work lead to early cessation of breastfeeding.14 Other parents experience low milk supply,15 breast/nipple pain,16 or infant or maternal health complications,17 while some opt not to breastfeed. Systemic and structural barriers such as racism and inequitable access to maternity care practices supportive of breastfeeding further perpetuate human milk feeding inequities in Black communities.18
Online discussions on this topic have been centered at the individual level, instead of community or systems levels. The calls to ‘just breastfeed’ as an easy and quick solution to the infant formula shortage are harmful.19 This leaves mothers and parents feeling forced to justify their infant feeding decisions and is counterproductive. The idea that infant feeding decisions, especially breastfeeding, are a choice is a myth. The truth is, having a choice is a privilege. Many purposively marginalized individuals and communities experience barriers that make meeting human milk feeding goals unattainable.11 These are decisions that are informed and influenced by media, family and friends, social media, federal, state and local policies, formula and breast pump industries, lived experiences, and available community resources.20,21
At the community level, there has been chronic underfunding of public health systems and infrastructure. This has included the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) program, outpatient lactation services, and communities of color-centered infant feeding organizations and community-led breastfeeding support programs.12 State and local breastfeeding coalitions do their best to fill in gaps, yet greater financial investments are needed to sustain critical efforts.22
On a federal level, by not supporting the World Health Organization/UNICEF International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (WHO Code)23 or developing Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies24,25 policies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, this shortage was inevitable. The WHO Code was created to promote and support safe infant nutrition while protecting consumers from predatory infant formula marketing practices, such as giving free gifts and infant formula samples to families and healthcare providers, creating misleading advertisements and product labeling, and offering substantial sales and giveaways in racialized communities.5 However, during the World Health Assembly in 1981, the U.S. was the only country to vote against adopting the WHO Code.26 It would take another 13 years for the U.S. to endorse the WHO Code at the World Health Assembly meeting in 1994. During the World Health Assembly in 2018, the U.S. attempted to derail the presented breastfeeding resolution.27 This move further solidified the influence of the infant formula industry and served as a reminder that the U.S. has been beholden to the $55 billion dollar5 global formula industry for over 40 years. This inability to put the health of infants and birthing people ahead of corporate interests confirms how little the U.S. prioritizes these populations.
Stronger policies and practices rooted in reproductive justice28 that truly support individuals and families before, during, and after pregnancy are needed to support human milk feeding goals and prevent infant formula shortages in the future. The formula shortage has been an eye-opening and dreadful situation all around. However, witnessing the ways communities and lactation support providers have come together through setting up community milk depots, sharing unopened, unexpired or recalled cans of formula to families in need, supporting relactation29 efforts, and helping families breast/chestfeeding longer has been inspiring. While heartwarming, these individual-level solutions are not sustainable. Communities without access or means to obtain or pay inflated infant formula prices or receive lactation support continue to be significantly impacted.
Families that rely on infant formula deserve proper infant feeding education and resources, unbiased and ethical infant formula marketing practices, and high-quality formula. Greater federal oversight and coordination of infant formula production are needed to ensure parents do not have to worry about their infants’ formula supply or the safety of the infant formula being used. Collective efforts are needed to call on infant formula companies, the Food and Drug Administration, and U.S. government to put infants, children, and families first.
Call to Action:
Prioritize funding for regional and national organizations supporting human milk and formula feeding families.
Strengthen formula regulations and set higher standards for infant formula safety and production.
Increase access to culturally-informed lactation education, resources, and support across the perinatal period.
Invest in Black, Latinx, Pacific Islander, Indigenous-centered and community-led breastfeeding support programs.
Prioritize diversification of the lactation workforce.
Ensure timely payment and reimbursement for lactation support, counseling, and services.
Ensure equitable access to inpatient and outpatient donor human milk and mandate expanded insurance coverage.
Provide opportunities for sustainable community milk sharing practices.
Strengthen public health systems and infrastructure by investing in the perinatal public health workforce, home visiting programs, outpatient lactation services, and WIC.
Increase infant and human milk feeding education across all curricula in health professions programs.
Advocate for paid family leave and workplace lactation accommodations.
Revisit and revise the 2011 Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding.12
Develop and implement Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies policies, at the state and federal levels.24,25
Enforce the World Health Organization/UNICEF International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (WHO Code).23
Let us not wait until another infant formula shortage threatens the health and wellbeing of our nation’s children. We need to develop equitable public health policies and practices that are truly supportive of parents, families, and communities across the life course. The time for urgent action to create safe and healthy environments for children to thrive in is now.
Acknowledgments
The author is very thankful to Dr. Aunchalee Palmquist, Dr. Audrey Lyndon, Robbie Gonzalez-Dow, and Tonya Kubo for their critical and meaningful reviews and comments of this article.
Funding Information
Ifeyinwa V. Asiodu was supported by a NICHD/ORWH-funded K12 (K12 HD052163) and Society of Family Planning Changemakers Award.
Footnotes
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Reproductive Justice. Sister Song website. https://www.sistersong.net/reproductive-justice. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Abrams SA, Duggan CP. Infant and child formula shortages: now is the time to prevent recurrences [published online ahead of print, 2022 May 17]. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;nqac149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thomas CL, Murphy LD, Mills MJ, et al. Employee lactation: A review and recommendations for research, practice, and policy. HRMR. 2022;32(3): 100848. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ketels K Baby formula industry was primed for disaster long before key factory closed down. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/baby-formula-industry-was-primed-for-disaster-long-before-key-factory-closed-down-183016?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=bylinetwitterbutton. Published May 19, 2022. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 5.World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. How the marketing of formula milk influences our decisions on infant feeding 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240044609. Accessed May 25, 2022. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 6.Agyeman J How urban planning and housing policy helped create ‘food apartheid’ in US cities. https://theconversation.com/how-urban-planning-and-housing-policy-helped-create-food-apartheid-in-us-cities-154433. Updated March 9, 2021. Accessed July 30, 2021.
- 7.Allers KS. Worries over formula shortages have stirred interest in re-lactation. Here’s what to know. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2020/04/10/worries-over-formula-shortages-have-stirred-interest-relactation-heres-what-know/. Published April 10, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 8.An official position statement of the Association of Women’s Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses. Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021;50(5):e1–e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):475–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hamner HC, Beauregard JL, Li R, Nelson JM, Perrine CG. Meeting breastfeeding intentions differ by race/ethnicity, Infant and Toddler Feeding Practices Study-2. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17(2):e13093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Center for Social Inclusion. Removing-Barriers-to-Breastfeeding: A Structural Race Analysis of First Food 2015. https://www.raceforward.org/system/files/pdf/reports/2015/CSI-Removing-Barriers-to-Breastfeeding-REPORT.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2022.
- 12.Office of the Surgeon General (US); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); Office on Women’s Health (US). The Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Support Breastfeeding. Rockville (MD): Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2011. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hamad R, Modrek S, White JS. Paid Family Leave Effects on Breastfeeding: A Quasi-Experimental Study of US Policies. Am J Public Health. 2019;109(1):164–166. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hilliard ED. A Review of Worksite Lactation Accommodations. Workplace Health Saf. 2017;65(1):33–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whipp MDM, Demirci JR. The sleeper effect of perceived insufficient milk supply in US mothers. Public Health Nutrition. 2021;24(5):935–941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Odom EC, Li R, Scanlon KS, Perrine CG, Grummer-Strawn L. Reasons for earlier than desired cessation of breastfeeding. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):e726–e732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Louis-Jacques A, Deubel TF, Taylor M, Stuebe AM. Racial and ethnic disparities in U.S. breastfeeding and implications for maternal and child health outcomes. Semin Perinatol. 2017;41(5):299–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Asiodu IV, Bugg K, Palmquist AEL. Achieving Breastfeeding Equity and Justice in Black Communities: Past, Present, and Future. Breastfeed Med. 2021;16(6):447–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Earls L The solution to formula shortage isn’t calling for more breastfeeding. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/05/18/solution-formula-shortage-isnt-calling-more-breastfeeding/. Published May 18, 2022. Accessed July 20, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Green VL, Killings NL, Clare CA. The Historical, Psychosocial, and Cultural Context of Breastfeeding in the African American Community. Breastfeed Med. 2021;16(2):116–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Merewood A, Bugg K, Burnham L, et al. Addressing Racial Inequities in Breastfeeding in the Southern United States. Pediatrics. 2019;143(2): [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Coalitions. United States Breastfeeding Committee website. http://www.usbreastfeeding.org/coalitions-support. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 23.World Health Organization. International Code of Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes 1981. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241541601. Accessed May 25, 2022.
- 24.Emergency Nutrition Network (ENN). Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies: Operational Guidance for Emergency Relief Staff and Programme Managers 2017. https://www.unhcr.org/45f6cd022.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2022.
- 25.Infant and Young Child Feeding in Emergencies (IYCF-E) Toolkit. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/emergencies-infant-feeding/index.html. Last Reviewed: June 17, 2022. Accessed July 20, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brady JP. Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97(6):529–532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andrews J Opposition to Breast-Feeding Resolution by U.S. Stuns World Health Officials. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html. Published July 8, 2018. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Asiodu I With Breastfeeding in Political Crosshairs, Advocates Must Reach Out Beyond Our Bubble. Rewire News Group. https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2018/07/13/breastfeeding-in-political-crosshairs/. Published July 13, 2018. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Breastfeeding - Supporting Families with Relactation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/supporting-families-with-relactation.html. Last Reviewed: June 4, 2020. Accessed May 25, 2022. [Google Scholar]
