Skip to main content
. 2022 May 21;3(4):270–274. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0216

Table 1.

Analysis of variance results for the effect of bacteriological status1 for the investigated traits

Item2 Bacteriological status
Contrast F-value
F-value P-value Negative vs. positive Strep. agalactiae vs. Prototheca
SCC traits
 SCS 22.63 <0.001 38.77*** 4.11
 DSCC, % 4.39 0.020 4.29* 3.77
 log PMN-LYM count 21.18 <0.001 35.54*** 4.48*
 log MAC count 22.54 <0.001 40.30*** 2.75
Leukocyte populations3
 Total WBC, % 16.67 <0.001 32.81*** 0.07
 PMN, % 10.23 0.001 9.86** 8.92**
 MAC, % 11.98 0.001 2.45 20.20***
 TL, % 4.14 0.024 2.36 6.57*
 THL % 4.23 0.022 1.48 7.48**
 CTL % 3.07 0.059
 BL % 1.23 0.303
 PMN+TL, % 10.24 0.001 17.53*** 1.88
 (PMN+MAC):TL, % 5.30 0.020 0.33 9.89**
1

Bacteriological status was classified into 3 classes: negative, positive for Streptococcus agalactiae and positive for Prototheca.

2

SCS = somatic cell score expressed as log2(SCC/100,000) + 3; DSCC = differential SCC; logPMN-LYM count = polymorphonuclear neutrophils-lymphocytes count expressed as log2[(PMN-LYM count)/100,000] + 3; logMAC count = macrophage count expressed as log2(MAC count/100,000) + 3; total WBC = total white blood cells, the sum of all individual leukocyte population percentages; BL = B lymphocytes; THL = T-helper lymphocytes; CTL = cytotoxic T lymphocytes; TL = total T lymphocytes.

3

Leukocyte populations are expressed as percentage of total events acquired by the cytofluorimeter.

*

P < 0.05

**

P < 0.01

***

P < 0.001.