Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2022 Mar 24;91:107090. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2022.107090

Table 2.

Demographics of ABCD participants with hair toxicology tests, and those with positive and negative hair test results indicating substance exposure.

Hair toxicology subsample Confirmed positive via hair Confirmed negative via hair Significant difference by confirmed result
(n = 696) (n = 116) (n = 580)
Age (years; range: 9–13) 10.65 years
(SD = 1.02)
10.8
(SD = 1.00)
10.62
(SD = 1.02)
Female 47.1% 37.1% 49.1% p = 0.02
Parents married 63.1% 45.7% 66.6% p < 0.001
Race/ethnicity p < 0.001
 Asian 0.7% 0% 0.8%
 Black 5.3% 12.9% 3.8%
 Hispanic 17.8% 17.2% 17.9%
 White 64.4% 54.3% 66.4%
 Other/multiple 11.8% 16.4% 11.0%
Parent education p < 0.001
 Less than high school diploma 3.1% 6.9% 2.4%
 High school/GED 7.6% 13.8% 6.4%
 Some college 29.0% 43.1% 26.2%
 Bachelor’s degree 27.3% 12.1% 30.3%
 Post graduate degree 32.9% 24.1% 34.7%
Yearly household income p < 0.001
 <$50,000 26.0% 44.8% 22.2%
 ≧$50,000 and <$100,000 27.4% 20.7% 28.8%
 ≧$100,000 40.2% 27.6% 42.7%
Time point
 Baseline 61.4% 56.0% 62.2%
 Year 1 follow-up 16.9% 21.5% 16.0%
 Year 2 follow-up 21.8% 22.4% 21.7%

Notes: If a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found for those with positive and negative hair tests, the p value is listed; sum totals of categories which are less than 100% are due to participants reporting “Don’t Know” or “Refuse to Answer”; sample size is calculated from the total number of hair samples assayed, with participants whose hair was assayed at two time points counted individually.