Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;9:11. doi: 10.1186/s44156-022-00011-8

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

ROC analysis for the identification of RVDYS using RV global (A), free wall (B), and septal (C) longitudinal strain as well as conventional RV indices ([D] TAPSE and RV S’). As shown, STE and FT-CMR had near equivalent diagnostic performance for RV GLS, followed by RV free wall and septal strain