Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;3(5):466–473. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.012

Table 2.

Multivariable model of risk factors for hematoma (full cohort, sorted by hazard ratio)

N (cat) Mean (cont) Hazard ratio Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI P value
Anticoagulant use 2968 NA 2.44 1.69 3.51 <.001
History of valve surgery 603 NA 2.11 1.42 3.15 <.001
Existing pocket reopened 5641 NA 1.92 1.06 3.47 .032
Antiplatelet use 4109 NA 1.66 1.14 2.42 .008
Male 4884 NA 1.63 1.06 2.50 .027
History of coronary artery disease 2862 NA 1.47 1.04 2.10 .031
Lead revised 2529 NA 1.45 0.94 2.23 .090
History of nonischemic cardiomyopathy 2066 NA 1.42 0.99 2.05 .058
Procedure time (hours increase) NA 0.92 1.21 0.98 1.50 .082
# Previous cardiac device procedures NA 1.33 1.14 0.99 1.32 .064
BMI (unit decrease) NA 29.16 1.06 1.03 1.09 <.001

To evaluate risk factors for hematoma, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used. Since a lower AIC indicates a better goodness-of-fit/complexity tradeoff, a global model of baseline and procedural characteristics was built using stepwise assessment of Cox proportional hazard regression to identify the model minimizing AIC. Since AIC minimization does not depend on P values, there is no minimal P value restriction. However, P values are provided to determine relative confidence among variables remaining in the model.

BMI = body mass index; cat = categorical variable; CI = confidence interval; cont = continuous variable; NA = not applicable.