Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;3(5):457–463. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.06.010

Table 2.

Symptoms and diagnostic findings after the primary cardiac resynchronization therapy procedure, compared to after repositioning of the left ventricular lead

Pre implant After first implant Change Pre LV repositioning After LV repositioning Change P value (for difference in delta)
NYHA class (average) +0.2 ± 0.4 -0.5 ± 0.5 <.001
 Class II 12 (48%) 8 (32%) 4 (16%) 17 (68%)
 Class III 13 (52%) 17 (68%) 21 (84%) 8 (32%)
Patient-assessed response <.001
 Deterioration 3 (12%) 0
 No change 16 (64%) 8 (32%)
 Some positive effect 6 (24%) 4 (16%)
 Marked positive effect 0 12 (48%)
 Not evaluated 0 1 (4%)
LVEF (%) 28 [22–31] 28 [22–30] 0 [-2 to +7] 25 [22–30] 30 [25–35] +5 [+2 to +11] .01
QRS duration (ms) 168 [154–182] 176 [151–190] +2 [-23 to +22] 180 [170–196] 148 [136–163] -36 [-44 to -8] <.001
NT-proBNP (ng/L) 1104 [612–2007] 2192 [986–2708] +359 [-147 to +1628] 2448 [924–3884] 1977 [686–2688] -615 [-2837 to +121] .03
Biventricular pace (%) 97.5 [87–99] 97.5 [88–99] .9

Results are based on N = 25 patients; data are presented as n (%) or mean [interquartile range].

LV = left ventricular; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; NYHA = New York Heart Association.