Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;108(22):1800–1806. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320876

Table 4.

Associations of high spectrum signal intensity coefficient and relative wall thickness with incident heart failure, overall and by sex

High spectrum SIC Relative wall thickness*
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Total sample
 Model 0 1.44 1.19 to 1.74 <0.001 1.42 1.21 to 1.67 <0.0001
 Model 1 1.25 1.03 to 1.52 0.02 1.21 1.02 to 1.45 0.03
 Model 2 1.23 1.01 to 1.50 0.04 1.17 0.97 to 1.40 0.10
 Model 3 1.10 0.89 to 1.35 0.38 1.13 0.95 to 1.36 0.17
Women
 Model 0 1.76 1.31 to 2.37 <0.001 1.06 0.73 to 1.53 0.76
 Model 1 1.61 1.20 to 2.17 <0.01 0.83 0.56 to 1.23 0.35
 Model 2 1.54 1.13 to 2.10 <0.01 0.78 0.53 to 1.17 0.23
 Model 3 1.47 1.06 to 2.03 0.02 0.77 0.51 to 1.16 0.21
Men
 Model 0 1.19 0.92 to 1.53 0.18 1.53 1.27 to 1.85 <0.0001
 Model 1 1.10 0.86 to 1.42 0.45 1.35 1.12 to 1.64 <0.01
 Model 2 1.09 0.83 to 1.41 0.51 1.32 1.09 to 1.61 <0.01
 Model 3 0.95 0.72 to 1.25 0.71 1.29 1.06 to 1.58 0.01

Model 0: High spectrum signal intensity coefficient and relative wall thickness.

Model 1: High spectrum signal intensity coefficient, relative wall thickness, age and sex.

Model 2: Model 1+antihypertensive medication use.

Model 3: Model 2+body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, smoking, and total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.

*Estimates are per 1-SD for high spectrum SIC and per 1-SD for relative wall thickness (SD=0.0634).

SIC, signal intensity coefficient.