Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;108(22):1800–1806. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-320876

Table 5.

Associations between relative wall thickness and incident heart failure, overall and by sex

Total sample Women Men
HR 95% CI P value Sex interaction
P
HR 95% CI P value HR 95% CI P value
Model 0 1.48 1.27 to 1.73 <0.0001 0.151 1.17 0.83 to 1.65 0.39 1.55 1.28 to 1.86 <0.0001
Model 1 1.23 1.04 to 1.46 0.02 0.101 0.91 0.62 to 1.33 0.62 1.35 1.12 to 1.64 <0.01
Model 2 1.18 0.99 to 1.41 0.07 0.093 0.83 0.57 to 1.23 0.36 1.33 1.09 to 1.61 <0.01
Model 3 1.14 0.95 to 1.36 0.16 0.075 0.81 0.55 to 1.19 0.28 1.30 1.06 to 1.58 0.01

Estimates are per 1-SD for relative wall thickness (SD=0.0634).

Model 0: Relative wall thickness alone.

Model 1: Relative wall thickness and sex stratified by age.

Model 2: Model 1+antihypertensive medication use.

Model 3: Model 2+body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, smoking and total/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio.