Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 15;2(2):119–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.011

Table 5.

Recent RCTs of Stenting Strategy for Distal Left Main Bifurcations

DKCRUSH V Trial EBC-MAIN Trial
Year of publication 2017 2021
Design Provisional strategy vs DK crush Provisional strategy vs up-front 2-stent strategy
Number of patients 482 467
Mean age, y 64.5 71.1
Male sex, % 80.2 76.9
Diabetes, % 27.2 27.4
Sites 26 sites (23 sites in Asia, 2 sites in United States, 1 site in Italy) 31 sites in 11 European countries
Operator experience ≥300 PCI/y and ≥20 left main PCI ≥150 PCI/y
Lesion type True unprotected left main bifurcation True unprotected left main bifurcation
Anatomic complexity
 Mean SYNTAX score 30.6 22.9
 Distal bifurcation angle 78° 81.3°
 Length of side branch lesion, mm 16.4 6.9
 Complex bifurcation, % 31.5 Not classified
Use of IVUS guidance Not mandated, 41.7% Not mandated, 32.5%
Up-front 2-stent strategy DK crush Culotte (53%), T/TAP (33%), DK crush (5%)
Conversion rate to 2-stent in provisional strategy, % 47 22
Stents used in the study Xience V (Abbott Vascular Inc), Endeavor Resolute (Medtronic Inc), Firebird 2 (MicroPort Medical) Resolute Onyx (Medtronic Inc)
Primary endpoint Target lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel MI, or target lesion revascularization Death, MI, or target lesion revascularization
Key findings (provisional vs 2 stent) 1 y: 10.7% vs 5.0%; P = 0.02
3 y: 16.9% vs 8.3%; P = 0.006
1 y: 14.7% vs 17.7%; P = 0.34

DK = double-kissing; DKCRUSH V = Double Kissing Crush versus Provisional Stenting for Left Main Distal Bifurcation Lesions; EBC-MAIN = European Bifurcation Club Left Main Study; TAP = T and protrusion; other abbreviations as in Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3.