Table 2.
Contrast | Group | Median | SD | 95% CI | PP | ER01 | ER10 | Star |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gr–IC | Stand | 7.529 | 1.036 | [5.577,9.579] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–IC | Walk | 5.879 | 0.984 | [4.117,7.942] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–IU | Stand | 4.064 | 0.673 | [2.792,5.475] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–IU | Walk | 3.412 | 0.666 | [2.114,4.711] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–OC | Stand | 5.958 | 0.855 | [4.279,7.617] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–OC | Walk | 5.665 | 0.860 | [4.083,7.433] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–OU | Stand | 3.047 | 0.636 | [1.806,4.279] | 1.000 | Inf | 0.000 | * |
Gr–OU | Walk | 1.627 | 0.606 | [0.421,2.786] | 0.998 | 420.053 | 0.002 | * |
OC–OU | Stand | − 2.919 | 0.752 | [− 4.432, − 1.484] | 0.000 | 0.000 | Inf | * |
OC–OU | Walk | − 4.046 | 0.755 | [− 5.501, − 2.563] | 0.000 | 0.000 | Inf | * |
IC–IU | Stand | − 3.482 | 0.896 | [− 5.202, − 1.72] | 0.000 | 0.000 | Inf | * |
IC–IU | Walk | − 2.454 | 0.814 | [− 4.136, − 0.946] | 0.001 | 0.001 | 887.889 | * |
OC–IC | Stand | 1.586 | 0.817 | [0.036,3.232] | 0.976 | 41.328 | 0.024 | * |
OC–IC | Walk | 0.210 | 0.753 | [− 1.188, 1.729] | 0.606 | 1.539 | 0.650 | |
OU–IU | Stand | 1.028 | 0.640 | [− 0.255,2.258] | 0.948 | 18.185 | 0.055 | |
OU–IU | Walk | 1.794 | 0.634 | [0.598,3.09] | 0.998 | 532.333 | 0.002 | * |
Note that arousal was measured in a 9-point scale (1 = excited to 9 = calm).
Median, standard deviation (SD), 95% credible intervals (CI) of contrasts between posterior estimates, Posterior probability (PP), evidence ratio (ER), ER01 in favour of the directional hypothesis (PP> 0) and ER10 in favour of the altenrative hypothesis (PP < 0), bold = posteior probability exceeds 85%; star = posterior probability exceeds 95%.