Table 3.

Contrasts for self-reported valence (SAM).

Contrast	Group	Median	SD	95% CI	PP	ER01	ER10	Star
Gr–IC	Stand	− 7.397	1.419	[− 10.441, − 4.916]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–IC	Walk	− 5.987	1.200	[− 8.508, − 3.895]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–IU	Stand	− 4.174	0.985	[− 6.267, − 2.388]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–IU	Walk	− 3.236	0.862	[− 5.042, − 1.675]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–OC	Stand	− 4.706	1.068	[− 6.973, − 2.83]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–OC	Walk	− 5.132	1.045	[− 7.403, − 3.332]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–OU	Stand	− 4.311	0.917	[− 6.246, − 2.673]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
Gr–OU	Walk	− 2.809	0.766	[− 4.387, − 1.405]	0.000	0.000	Inf	*
OC–OU	Stand	0.415	0.897	[− 1.393, 2.156]	0.681	2.131	0.469
OC–OU	Walk	2.311	0.926	[0.546,4.195]	0.996	274.862	0.004	*
IC–IU	Stand	3.203	1.050	[1.36,5.465]	1.000	7999.000	0.000	*
IC–IU	Walk	2.733	0.980	[0.96,4.784]	0.999	999.000	0.001	*
OC–IC	Stand	− 2.670	0.956	[− 4.7, − 0.963]	0.001	0.001	1141.857	*
OC–IC	Walk	− 0.853	0.834	[− 2.504, 0.83]	0.142	0.165	6.067
OU–IU	Stand	0.123	0.758	[− 1.424, 1.554]	0.570	1.324	0.756
OU–IU	Walk	− 0.434	0.724	[− 1.846, 0.999]	0.269	0.368	2.721

Note that valence was measured on a 9-point scale (1 = positive and 9 = negative).

Median, standard deviation (SD), 95% credible intervals (CI) of contrasts between posterior estimates, Posterior probability (PP), evidence ratio (ER), ER01 in favour of the directional hypothesis (PP> 0) and ER10 in favour of the altenrative hypothesis (PP < 0), bold = posteior probability exceeds 85%; star = posterior probability exceeds 95%.