Abstract
SCO6993 (606 amino acids) in Streptomyces coelicolor belongs to the large ATP-binding regulators of the LuxR family regulators having one DNA-binding motif. Our previous findings predicted that SCO6993 may suppress the production of pigmented antibiotics, actinorhodin, and undecylprodigiosin, in S. coelicolor, resulting in the characterization of its properties at the molecular level. SCO6993-disruptant, S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993 produced excess pigments in R2YE plates as early as the third day of culture and showed 9.0-fold and 1.8-fold increased production of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin in R2YE broth, respectively, compared with that by the wild strain and S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993/SCO6993+. Real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that the transcription of actA and actII-ORF4 in the actinorhodin biosynthetic gene cluster and that of redD and redQ in the undecylprodigiosin biosynthetic gene cluster were significantly increased by SCO6993-disruptant. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay and DNase footprinting analysis confirmed that SCO6993 protein could bind only to the promoters of pathway-specific transcriptional activator genes, actII-ORF4 and redD, and a specific palindromic sequence is essential for SCO6993 binding. Moreover, SCO6993 bound to two palindromic sequences on its promoter region. These results indicate that SCO6993 suppresses the expression of other biosynthetic genes in the cluster by repressing the transcription of actII-ORF4 and redD and consequently negatively regulating antibiotic production.
Keywords: Streptomyces coelicolor, SCO6993, LuxR family, actinorhodin, undecylprodigiosin
Introduction
Streptomycetes are a group of gram-positive, filamentous soil bacteria that exhibit unique morphological differentiation, developing aerial mycelia and spores. During this morphological differentiation, a secondary metabolism begins which is called physiological differentiation. Numerous scientific findings have revealed that the morphological and physiological differentiations in streptomycetes are closely related and controlled by many regulatory factors [1]. The genes responsible for secondary metabolism and morphological differentiation are clustered in the chromosomal DNA and their expressions are controlled by pathway-specific regulatory gene(s) in the cluster and by global regulatory genes.
Streptomyces coelicolor produces multiple genetically and structurally distinct antibiotic substances, and the production of pigmented antibiotics, blue-colored actinorhodin and red-colored undecylprodigiosin, is regulated by the pathway-specific transcriptional regulatory genes actII-ORF4 [2] and redD [3] in the biosynthetic gene cluster. ActII-ORF4 and RedD proteins are the transcriptional activators that bind to the operator regions of the biosynthetic genes and positively regulate the transcription of each gene in the clusters.
Due to easy discrimination of pigmentations in plate culture, several classes of blocked mutants, such as abs [4], afs [5], and bld [6], which block more than one antibiotic, were isolated to identify the global regulatory genes. For example, afs (A-factor synthesis deficient) mutation results in failure to produce A-factor (γ-butyrolactone), a microbial hormone, and at least four antibiotics, including the two pigmented antibiotics, methylenomycin and Ca2+-dependent antibiotic, in S. coelicolor A3(2) [7]. The multiple serine/threonine kinases, including AfsK, AfsL, and PkaG phosphorylate AfsR (a central protein that restores afs mutation), and the phosphorylated AfsR bind to the promoter of afsS for transcriptional activation. The resulting AfsS protein induces the transcription of pathway-specific transcriptional activators, such as actII-ORF4 and redD, for actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin production, respectively [5, 8].
However, the regulation of secondary metabolism appears much more complex than speculated. For example, the transcription of actII-ORF4 and redD is controlled by other transcriptional activators, AtrA [3] and RedZ [9], respectively. Moreover, absA1/A2 complementing absA (antibiotic synthesis deficient) mutation that fails to produce four distinct antibiotics encodes the bacterial two-component regulatory proteins, the sensor histidine kinase (AbsA1) and response regulator aspartic acid kinase (AbsA2) [4]. The AbsA2 acts as a negative regulator of antibiotic production in S. coelicolor A3(2) by binding to the promoter regions of actII-ORF4 and redZ [10]. Furthermore, tens of activator/repressor proteins have been reported in relation to the transcriptional regulation of actII-ORF4 and redD in S. coelicolor A3(2), indicating the complexity of the regulatory network for secondary metabolism in Streptomyces [11].
Recently, we reported that the introduction of SCO6992 gene encoding a novel β-glucuronidase dramatically increased the biosynthesis of undecylprodigiosin and actinorhodin in absR- mutant of S. coelicolor J1501. This antibiotic biosynthesis-promoting effect of SCO6992 was abolished by the presence of SCO6993, which acts in opposition to SCO6992 [12]. Based on this, SCO6993 is expected to be a regulatory gene that suppresses antibiotic biosynthesis. Therefore, we report here the regulatory role of the LuxR-type SCO6993 protein in the antibiotic biosynthesis of S. coelicolor J1501.
Material and Methods
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids
S. coelicolor J1501 (hisA1 uraA1 strA1 SCP1- SCP2- Pgl-), a mutant strain of S. coelicolor A3(2), was kindly provided by Dr. Wendy Champness of Michigan State University [13]. pET28a(+) was used for the expression of SCO6993 in E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS (Stratagene, USA). E. coli ET12567 with the pUZ8002 plasmid was used for conjugal transfer [14]. E. coli BW25113 strain with the λred recombination plasmid pIJ790 and cosmid SC8F11 was obtained from the John Inns Institute (UK) and used for genetic recombination [15].
Media and Culture Conditions
E. coli was maintained on M9 minimal agar and cultured in LB medium [16] at 37°C with agitation. Streptomyces strains were routinely maintained on minimal medium or R2YE medium [17] at 30°C. For cultivation of S. coelicolor J1501, the medium was supplemented with histidine and uracil at final concentrations of 50 μg/ml and 7.5 μg/ml, respectively [12]. Thiostrepton (25 μg/ml), apramycin (50 μg/ml), and kanamycin (50 μg/ml) were added to the media, when necessary.
Enzymes and Chemicals
DNA-modifying enzymes were purchased from DyneBio Inc. (Korea), and other non-specified fine chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (USA). All primer pairs used in this study were synthesized by Xenotech (Korea) and are listed in Table S1 with their respective uses.
DNA Manipulations and Transformation
DNA manipulation and transformation were performed by following the methods described by Sambrook and Russel [16] for E. coli and Kieser et al. [17] for Streptomyces. All experimental kits and enzymes were used according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Quantitation of Antibiotics
The production of pigmented antibiotics, actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin, on plates, was observed by naked eye and identified based on the color change during the cultivation of Streptomyces strains on the R2YE medium. For actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin quantitation in broth culture, an exponential culture (5 ml) of S. coelicolor was transferred to 100 ml of R2YE broth in a 500 ml baffled flask and incubated at 30°C on a reciprocal shaker. Portions (5.0 ml) of the culture broth were taken out at intervals and the concentrations of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin were measured at 633 nm (A633) and 530 nm (A530), respectively, as previously described [12].
Construction of ΔSCO6993 Mutant
The SCO6993-disrupted mutant was constructed by replacing all of the SCO6993 coding sequence with apramycin resistance cassette [aac(3)IV] using the redirect polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting method [18]. The upstream primer for ΔSCO6993 contains the SCO6993 sequence up to the start codon (in bold) and is linked to the aac(3)IV sequence (underlined); 5′-GGG GGG TAC TCA AGT CAC CCT GTA TCA GGG ATG AGT ATG ATT CCG GGG ATC CGT CGA CC-3′). The downstream reverse primer contains the ΔSCO6993 stop codon (in bold) and is linked to the aac(3)IV sequence (underlined); 5′-GGG CGG CCT GAG CCC GCC CGG TGC CCG GCC GCC GGG TCA TGT AGG CTG GAG CTG CTT C-3′. The resulting PCR product was introduced by electroporation into the E. coli BW25113 strain that harbors the λred recombination plasmid pIJ790 and cosmid SC8F11 (a gift from K. Chater at John Innes Centre) carrying SCO6993 [15]. The gene structure of the resulting cosmids (SC8F11 ΔSCO6993::apr) recovered from the selected transformants was verified, and the cosmids were introduced into the E. coli ET12567 carrying pUZ8002 and then transferred into S. coelicolor J1501 by conjugation [18]. The apramycin-resistant and kanamycin-sensitive exconjugants were selected, and the expected gene structure in ΔSCO6993::apr mutant was confirmed by Southern hybridization and reverse transcription (RT)-PCR. For complementing SCO6993 disruption, the recombinant plasmid pWHM3-O2 containing the entire SCO6993 with its promoter region as described previously [12] was transformed into ΔSCO6993::apr mutant, yielding S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993/SCO6993+.
Southern Hybridization
To confirm the ΔSCO6993::apr mutant, chromosomal DNAs were isolated and digested using BamHI restriction enzyme. The fully digested genomic DNAs were applied to 0.8% TBE-agarose gel. Resolved DNA fragments were depurinated in 0.25 M HCl for 20 min when required, washed with distilled water briefly, denatured in 0.4 M NaOH for 10 min, and transferred to Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Life Science, UK) in 0.4 M NaOH. The aac(3)IV probe DNA was amplified with DIG-labeled nucleotides and hybridized overnight. The signal was detected before image scanning following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Preparation of Total RNA and cDNA
The fresh spores of S. coelicolor strains were inoculated into 25 ml R2YE broth in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks or R2YE plates and incubated at 28°C. The cultured cells were quickly harvested, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then ground into powder. Total RNA was purified using an RNeasy Mini Kit in combination with RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Netherlands). The DNA in the RNA sample was removed through on-column DNase digestion using an RNase-Free DNase Set (Qiagen). Then, cDNA was synthesized from the total RNA sample using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, USA). Annealing reaction was performed at 25°C for 10 min, and then RT was performed at 50°C for 50 min. Reverse transcriptase was inactivated by heat treatment (85°C, 5 min). After cooling at 4°C, the remaining RNA was removed by RNase H treatment (37°C, 20 min). The synthesized cDNA was stored at -80°C.
Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)
To check the transcription level of S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993, RT-PCR was performed using the synthesized cDNA, primers (Table S1), and rTaq Plus 5x PCR Master Mix (ELPIS Biotech, Korea). After denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, the PCR reaction (denaturation at 95°C for 10 s; annealing at 68°C for 10 s; and extension at 72°C for 10 s) was repeated 28 times. The housekeeping hrdB gene encoding RNA polymerase sigma factor was used as control.
Real-Time PCR Analysis
To check the transcription level of the genes related to actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin biosynthesis, real-time PCR analysis was performed using the synthesized cDNA and 2x Real-Time PCR Premix with Evagreen (SolGent, Korea). actA (encoding an efflux pump) and actII-ORF4 (encoding a transcriptional activator) were chosen among the actinorhodin biosynthetic genes, and redD (encoding a transcriptional activator) and redQ (encoding an acyl carrier protein) were chosen from the undecylprodigiosin biosynthetic gene clusters. The reaction was performed at 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 20 s, 58°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 20 s in a 20 μl volume mix containing 1 μl of 20x EvaGreen, 0.25 μM primers (Table S1), and 40 ng cDNA. Thermocycling and fluorescence detection were performed in triplicates for each cDNA sample using the Stratagene Mx3000p Real-Time PCR System (Stratagene). Following amplification, the experiment was converted to a comparative quantification (calibrator) experiment type and analysis was performed using the Mx3000P software v2.02 (Stratagene). The housekeeping hrdB gene was used as a reference.
Heterologous Expression and Purification of SCO6993
The SCO6993 gene was amplified by PCR from the S. coelicolor J1501 genomic DNA using primer sets (Table S1). The NdeI-XhoI-digested PCR product was subcloned into pET28a(+) yielding pET28a-SCO6993. E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a-SCO6993 was cultured in 200 ml of LB broth to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5. The overexpression of SCO6993 was induced by adding IPTG (0.5 mM), and there was further cultivation at 16°C for 12 h. From the cells, the recombinant SCO6993 (rSCO6993) protein was purified using His60 Ni Superflow Resin & Gravity Columns (Takara Bio Company, Japan). Protein concentration was measured using a Bradford Protein Microassay Kit (Bio-Rad, USA) with bovine serum albumin as the standard protein.
The molecular mass of the purified rSCO6993 was determined by gel filtration chromatography. The ÄKTA-FPLC System (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, USA) equipped with a Superose 12 10/300 GL column was used at 25°C. The mobile phase (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9) + 100 mM NaCl) was applied at a flow rate of 0.7 ml/min and protein concentration was monitored at 280 nm.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
The binding ability of rSCO6993 to the promoter regions of SCO6993, actA, actII-ORF4, redQ, and redD was evaluated using the EMSA. For the SCO6993, two kinds of DNA probes, SCO6993-P1 (206 bp) and SCO6993-P2 (192 bp), were amplified from the S. coelicolor J1501 genomic DNA by PCR using primer sets (Table S1). Other probes for actA, actII-ORF4, redQ, and redD were also prepared in the same way. Binding reactions (20 μl) were performed in binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 12.5% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, and 0.4 mM EDTA) with a 0.3 nM DNA probe at 28°C for 30 min. The sonicated salmon sperm DNA (100 mg/ml) was used as a competitor and the binding of the SCO6993 to the DNA fragments was analyzed using 1.5% TBE agarose gel.
Mapping of the SCO6993-Binding Sites
DNase 1 footprinting analysis was performed with capillary DNA sequencer using a fluorescent-labeled PCR fragment as previously described [19]. Primers for analysis of each promoter region were used by labeling the same primers as those used in the EMSA experiment with 5' 6-FAM (6-carboxyfluorescein) (Table S1). The labeled DNA probes (540 ng) were incubated with the SCO6993 protein (25 μg) at 28°C for 20 min in the binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM DTT, 12.5% glycerol, 50 mM NaCl, and 0.4 mM EDTA). The digestion of the DNA probe was performed at 37°C using one unit of DNase 1 (Promega, USA) per 50 μl reaction solution. After 5 min, a stop buffer (130 mM NaCl, 20 mM EDTA, and 0.6% SDS) was added, and the digested DNA probe was purified using a PCR purification kit (Qiagen). The fluorescence patterns of the sample were analyzed using a 3730 Automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA), and electropherograms were used for determining the protected patterns of each promoter after digestion with DNase 1 following incubation with SCO6993 protein.
Results
SCO6993 Belongs to the Large ATP-Binding Regulators of the LuxR (LAL) Family
The SCO6993 protein (606 amino acids, 65.7 kDa, GenBank AAF19104.1) showed significant similarity with numerous proteins annotated as LuxR-type, DNA-binding regulators in the genus Streptomyces. BlastP analysis (BLAST: Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (nih.gov)) identified more than 100 proteins showing more than 98%homology to SCO6993 in the amino acid sequence in Streptomyces, implying that the SCO6993 homologous gene is widely distributed in genus Streptomyces. SCO6993 has one ATP/GTP-binding P-loop motif conserved in ATPase and one helix-turn helix LuxR-type DNA-binding motif in the C-terminal region, which is a characteristic of the LAL family protein (Fig. 1). In this context, SCO6993 was expected to be a DNA-binding regulatory protein.
Fig. 1. Characteristics of SCO6993 gene in S. coelicolor J1501.
(A) Chromosomal gene organization (upper) and distribution of conserved domains (lower). The arrows indicate individual ORFs, with the stop codon marked by the arrowhead. The SCO6992 and SCO6993 genes are in opposite directions, and the two genes are 78 bp apart from each putative transcription initiation point. SCO6993 (646 amino acids) contains ATP/GTP-binding P-loop domain (Phe-23 ~ Leu-135, Evalue of 2.36e-03) and one LuxR-type helix-turn-helix DNA binding domain (Leu-543 ~ Arg-590, E-value of 6.58e-14). (B) Alignment of amino acids sequence of C-terminal DNA-binding domain of LuxR-like proteins (cd06170). Highly conserved amino acids for DNA binding are indicated by asterisks. 1H0M_B; a transcriptional activator protein TraR from Agrobacterium tumefaciens, P17051.3; a transcriptional regulator AlkS from Pseudomonas oleovorans,1YIO_A; a regulator StyR from Pseudomonas fluorescens, P31802.1; a nitrate/nitrite response regulator protein NarP from Escherichia coli K-12, Q01108.1; a bialaphos biosynthetic pathway regulatory protein from Streptomyces hygroscopicus.
SCO6993 Gene Deletion Results in Increased Production of Pigmented Antibiotics
In a previous study [12], SCO6993 was expected to be a suppressor for pigmented antibiotic production. Thus, SCO6993-disrupted strain (ΔSCO6993) was constructed using a PCR targeting system (Fig. 2A). For the apramycin-resistant and kanamycin-sensitive exconjugants, ΔSCO6993::apr mutant was confirmed using Southern blotting and hybridization with a DIG-labeled apramycin-cassette probe (Fig. 2B). According to the RT-PCR analysis, the transcript of SCO6993 in the S. coelicolor J1501 on R2YE plate was maximally detected on the third day of cultivation, and a significant amount was also detected on the fifth day. However, no transcript of SCO6993 was detected in the ΔSCO6993 strain during cultivation (Fig. 2C), indicating that the SCO6993 gene in the ΔSCO6993::apr mutant completely lost its function.
Fig. 2. Disruption of the chromosomal SCO6993 gene in S. coelicolor J1501.
(A) Schematic representation of disruption. The sizes of the expected fragments of the disruptant with probe 1 and probe 2 are indicated. apr, apramycin resistance. (B) Genomic Southern blotting analysis for confirming ΔSCO6993 mutant strain. The sizes of the DNA marker bands are shown on the left. The detected signals represent hybridized DNA fragments with DIG-labeled apr-cassette probe (1,236 bp). The hybridized signal of the expected size (6,507 bp) was observed in ΔSCO6993 mutant (lane 1 and 2) but not in the wild type. (C) Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analysis for confirming ΔSCO6993 mutant strain cultured on R2YE plate. In S. coelicolor J1501, a large amount of the SCO6993 gene transcript was detected on the third day (maximum level) and the fifth day of cultivation, but no transcript was detected in the ΔSCO6993 mutant strain. The housekeeping hrdB gene encoding RNA polymerase sigma factor was used as control.
The antibiotic production ability of the ΔSCO6993 mutant was compared to that of the parent strain by culturing in solid and liquid media. On the R2YE plates, little pigment production was observed in the J1501 parental strain, while the ΔSCO6993 mutant continuously produced excess pigments from the third day of culture (Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3. Effect of SCO6993 disruption on pigmented antibiotic production in S. coelicolor J1501.
(A) Photographs of S. coelicolor strains cultured on R2YE agar plate for 5 days. S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993 showed a large amount of pigment production from the third day of culture, but the parent strain J1501 and the mutant complemented with SCO6993 (S. coelicolor ΔSCO6992/SCO6992+) produced a small amount of pigment even on the fifth day. (B) Pigmented antibiotic production in R2YE broth. The culture samples were taken on the seventh day of cultivation and processed. The quantification of actinorhodin (left) and undecylprodigiosin (right) was performed by measuring the absorbance at 633 nm and 530 nm, respectively. (C) Transcript analysis by real-time polymerase chain reaction for actinorhodin (upper) and undecylprodigiosin (lower) biosynthetic genes of S. coelicolor strains cultured on R2YE agar plate. The culture samples were taken at indicated time intervals and processed as described in the Materials and Methods section. Then, the experiment was converted to a comparative quantification (calibrator) experiment and analyzed with the Mx3000P software v2.02. The housekeeping hrdB gene was used as a reference. In (B) and (C), all the experiments were repeated at least three times, and their average values were calculated. J1501, S. coelicolor J1501; ΔSCO6993, S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993; ΔSCO6993/SCO6993+, S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993 complemented with native SCO6993 gene.
In the R2YE liquid culture, the ΔSCO6993 strain began producing large amounts of pigment from the third day of culture. On the seventh day, the ΔSCO6993 strain showed 9.0-fold and 1.8-fold increased production of actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin, respectively, compared to that by the S. coelicolor J1501 strain (Fig. 3B). The SCO6993-complemented S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993/SCO6993+ strain had its normal phenotype restored as in J1501 in solid (Fig. 3A) and liquid media (Fig. 3B).
Transcriptions of Pigmented Antibiotic Biosynthetic Genes Are Enhanced in SCO6993-Deleted Strain
To understand the reason for the increased production of pigmented antibiotics in ΔSCO6993 strain, real-time PCR analysis was performed on the two genes (actA and actII-ORF4) in the actinorhodin biosynthetic gene cluster and the two genes (redD and redQ) in the undecylprodigiosin biosynthetic gene cluster. The real-time PCR analysis showed that the transcription of all the tested genes was significantly enhanced in the ΔSCO6993 strain from the beginning of the culture in R2YE broth, compared with that in J1501 and S. coelicolor ΔSCO6993/SCO6993+ (Fig. 3C).
The transcription of actII-ORF4 increased in proportion to the cultivation time, but that of redD showed a maximum level on the first day of culture. When observing the R2YE plate culture of these strains, the production of red-colored undecylprodigiosin was visually confirmed from the first day of culture, and the production of blue-colored actinorhodin was observed from the third day of culture (Fig. 3A). These results strongly suggest that undecylprodigiosin production begins temporally faster than actinorhodin production.
SCO6993 Binds to the Promoter Regions of actII-ORF4 and redD Regulatory Genes
To determine the DNA-binding ability of the LuxR-type regulator, the recombinant protein rSCO6993 was overexpressed with 20 additional amino acids including 6xHis-tag, which originated from the vector at the N-terminal. The purified rSCO6993 protein showed a single band by SDS-PAGE analysis, which is consistent with a calculated molecular weight of 66.8 kDa (Fig. 4A). The gel filtration chromatography analysis revealed that the molecular weight of native SCO6993 was 129.6 kDa, indicating that it forms a dimer (Fig. 4B).
Fig. 4. Purification and molecular weight estimation of SCO6993.
(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electropherogram. rSCO6993 (His6-SCO6993) was overexpressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a-SCO6993 and purified by His60 Ni Superflow Resin chromatography as indicated by an arrow. Lanes: M, molecular weight size markers; 1, E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a before induction; 2, E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a after induction; 3, E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a-SCO6993 before induction; 4, E. coli BL21 (DE3)/pET28a-SCO6993 after induction; 5, purified His6-SCO6993 protein; and 6, purified His6-SCO6993 protein after dialysis. (B) Gel-filtration chromatogram. (Left) The purified rSCO6993 protein (2.5 mg/ml) was applied on HiLoad 16/60 superdex 200 prep-grade column and the elution profile was monitored at 280 nm (A280). (Right) The molecular mass of rSCO6993 was calculated from the elution profile of the size marker proteins: position a, β-amylase (200 kDa); position b, yeast alcohol dehydrogenase (150 kDa); position c, bovine serum albumin (66 kDa); position d, bovine carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa). Blue dextran 2000 was used to determine the column void volume (V0). The position of rSCO6993 elution peak is indicated with an arrow.
Next, a DNA fragment containing the upstream regions of actA, actII-ORF4, redD, and redQ served as the binding partner of rSCO6993 in the EMSAs. DNA fragments of 327 bp (pactII-ORF4; between positions -207 and+120 with respect to the actII-ORF4 translation start site), 383 bp (pactA; between positions -273 and +110 with respect to the actA translation start site), 400 bp (predD; between positions -350 and +50 with respect to the redD translation start site), and 350 bp (predQ; between positions -300 and +27 with respect to the redQ translation start site) were used as DNA probes for actII-ORF4, actA, redD, and redQ, respectively (Table S1). As a result, the retardation of DNA mobility for the two pathway-specific genes, actII-ORF4 and redD, was confirmed, but not for biosynthetic genes actA and redQ (Fig. 5A). The intensity of the retardation signal increased in proportion to the concentration of added SCO6993. The addition of salmon sperm DNA (100 mg/ml) to the reaction inhibited complex formation between SCO6993 and the DNA substrate.
Fig. 5. DNA-binding ability of SCO6993 to the promoter regions of actinorhodin (act) and undecylprodigiosin biosynthetic genes.
(A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed with purified His6-SCO6993 on the promoter regions of the genes involved in actinorhodin (act) and undecylprodigiosin (red) biosynthesis. The DNA probes used were the upstream regions of actII-ORF4 (pactII-ORF4), actA (pactA), redD (predD), and redQ (predQ). Each 20 μl binding reaction mixture containing the DNA probe (0.3 nM) and the SCO6993 protein at various concentrations (0–30 μg), was subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% TBE agarose gel. sDNA, salmon sperm DNA. (B, C) DNase 1 footprinting assays. Electropherograms showing the protection pattern of each promoter of the fluorescent dye-labeled upstream regions of actIIORF4 (B) and redD (C) after digestion with DNase 1 following incubation in the absence (upper) or presence (lower) of SCO6993 protein. The y-axis represents fluorescence intensity (i.e., fragment abundance), while the x-axis represents elution position, which is proportional to size. At the bottom is a scale that shows nucleotide position relative to each gene. The protected regions are indicated with a red box, and the protected sequences (SCO6993-binding sites) with palindrome sequences are shown below. The numbers refer to the distance from the translation start site of each gene.
SCO6993 Binds to Palindromic Sequences in the Promoter Regions of actII-ORF4 and redD Genes
SCO6993-binding sites within the promoter regions of actII-ORF4 and redD were validated using DNase 1 footprinting analysis. The electropherograms showed the protected patterns of each promoter after digestion with DNase 1 following incubation with SCO6993 protein. The results showed that the region of actII-ORF4 promoter protected by SCO6993 was from -190 to -174 nt (-190ATTCTAATTGATTCGGAA-174, palindromic sequence is underlined) (Fig. 5B), whereas the region of redD promoter protected by SCO6993 was -22 to -1 nt (-22CCCGAA TCCGATCGTTCGGTGG-1, palindromic sequence is underlined) (Fig. 5C). The binding motif of most LuxR family transcriptional regulators is palindromic, but highly degenerate due to sequence variations in each promoter [20]. Similarly, the binding sequences in the promoter regions of actII-ORF4 and redD comprise palindromes; however, no homology was found between the two.
In summary, SCO6993 appears to suppress the transcription of the pathway-specific regulatory genes actII-ORF4 and redD by binding directly to their promoter regions. Accordingly, the transcription of the antibiotic biosynthesis genes actA and redQ will be regulated in succession by the pathway-specific transcriptional activators ActII-ORF4 and RedD, respectively.
SCO6993 Binds to Its Own Promoter Region
Many transcriptional regulatory proteins can bind to their respective promoter for self-regulation and thus EMSA was performed on the promoter region of SCO6993 gene. The shifted bands by retarded mobility were detected in all the reactions using probes SCO6993-P1 (207 bp; between positions -240 and -34 with respect to the SCO6993 translation start site) and SCO6993-P2 (192 bp; between positions -78 and +114 with respect to the SCO6993 translation start site), and the amount of shifted DNA was proportional to that of protein added (Fig. 6A). The addition of excess salmon sperm DNA abolished the band shift of DNA. Consistent with the EMSA results, DNase 1 footprinting analysis confirmed the two SCO6993-binding sites. The regions of SCO6993 promoter protected by SCO6993 were from -144 to -131 nt (-144GGCGGCCAGCCCCG-131, palindromic sequence is underlined) and from -54 to -37 nt (-54GGTCCCGGCGCCTGAGTC-37, palindromic sequence is underlined) as we expected (Figs. 6B and 6C). These results strongly suggest that SCO6993 can self-regulate the expression of its encoding genes by binding to its promoter region.
Fig. 6. DNA-binding ability of SCO6993 to its promoter region.
(A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed with purified His6-SCO6993 on the promoter regions of SCO6993. The DNA probes were SCO6993-P1 (-240 ~ -34) and SCO6993-P2 (-55 ~ +114). Each 20 μl binding reaction mixture containing the DNA probe (0.3 nM) and the SCO6993 protein at various concentrations (0–30 μg) was subjected to electrophoresis on 1.5% TBE agarose gel. sDNA, salmon sperm DNA. (B, C) DNase 1 footprinting assays using Probe-P1 (B) and Probe-P2 (C). Electropherograms showing the protection pattern of each promoter of fluorescent dye-labeled upstream region of SCO6993 after digestion with DNase 1 following incubation in the absence (upper) or presence (lower) of SCO6993 protein. The y-axis represents fluorescence intensity (i.e., fragment abundance), while the x-axis represents elution position, which is proportional to size. At the bottom is a scale that shows the nucleotide position relative to each gene. Two protected regions are indicated with a red box, and the protected sequences (SCO6993-binding sites) with palindrome sequences are shown below. The numbers refer to the distance from the translation start site of each gene.
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that SCO6993, a LAL-type global regulator, suppressed actinorhodin and undecylprodigiosin production by binding to the promoter regions of the pathway-specific regulatory genes actII-ORF4 and redD, respectively, in S. coelicolor J1501 and repressing their transcription.
LuxR family proteins were identified as transcriptional regulators for quorum sensing-related genes [21, 22] in Vibrio fischeri. They have a DNA-binding domain (helix-turn-helix motif) at the C-terminal module for binding specific nucleotide sequences near target promoters and the N-terminal domain for binding effector molecules, thereby regulating the transcription of target genes [23, 24]. In the quorum-sensing regulation, the N-acyl derivatives of homoserine lactone (Acyl HSL) binds to the N-terminal domain and triggers LuxR dimerization. Because A-factor (homoserine lactone) was reported as a microbial hormone to control physiological and morphological differentiations in Streptomyces including S. coelicolor [7], it may be listed as one of the plausible effector candidates for SCO6993. Notably, the binding ability of rSCO6993 to its promoter region was not affected by D-glucose, D-galactose, and D-glucuronic acid (Fig. S1).
The LAL family regulator MalT was first reported in the maltose regulon in E. coli [25]. LAL regulators are characterized by a big molecular size due to the presence of an N-terminal ATP/GTP-binding domain (Walker A motif) [26] and a C-terminal LuxR-type DNA-binding domain, which are well conserved in SCO6993. MalT positively regulates the transcription of the maltose regulon by its specific binding to the short DNA motif, called the MalT box (5′-GGA[TG]GA-3′), in the promoter region of its target genes. [27]. By contrast, numerous LuxR family regulators recognize and bind to specific target binding sites with inverted repeats. For instance, LuxR dimer involved in quorum sensing binds to a 20-bp inverted repeat [22], and GerE dimers controlling respiratory-related operons in E. coli bind to two 12-bp inverted repeats having a central four-base overlap [28]. Our results indicate that SCO6993 can recognize specific nucleotide sequences containing short, inverted repeats, but the consensus binding site could not be predicted.
Multiple LAL family regulators have been reported to be present in the biosynthetic gene clusters of the secondary metabolites in Streptomyces. PikD [29], RapH [30], NysRI [31], TmcN [32], SanG [33], TrdH [34], and AmphRI [35] were identified as LAL family pathway-specific regulators in pikromycin, rapamycin, nystatin, tautomycetin, nikkomycin, tirandamycin, and amphotericin biosynthetic pathways, respectively. Furthermore, LAL regulators play a global regulatory role at higher levels of the regulatory cascade. For example, LAL regulator PimR activates PimM expression in Streptomyces natalensis and LuxR-type pathway-specific regulator PimM directly stimulates the transcription of pimaricin biosynthetic genes [36], which is very similar to the relationship between SCO6993 and pathway-specific regulatory genes actII-ORF4 and redD.
Most LAL regulators function as positive or negative regulators, but some of them act simultaneously as positive and negative regulators depending on the regulatory pathway. In S. coelicolor, the LAL regulators SCO0877 and SCO7173 function as repressors of the expression of the two-component PhoRP system in phosphate starvation response and as activators of actinorhodin biosynthesis [37]. The pathway-specific regulator AveR was also reported to be a positive regulator of avermectin production but a negative regulator of oligomycin biosynthesis in Streptomyces avermitilis [38]. Interestingly, we found that the ability of aerial mycelium formation was completely abolished by deleting the SCO6993 in S. coelicolor (Figs. S2 and S3), indicating that SCO6993 regulates morphological differentiation positively like the bld genes [6, 39]. Thus, SCO6993 can be defined as a global regulatory protein acting negatively or positively in controlling the physiological and morphological differentiations of S. coelicolor J1501.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2020R1F1A1060789).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1.McCormick JR, Flärdh K. Signals and regulators that govern Streptomyces development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2012;36:206–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00317.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arias P, Fernández-Moreno MA, Malpartida F. Characterization of the pathway-specific positive transcriptional regulator for actinorhodin biosynthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) as a DNA-binding protein. J. Bacteriol. 1999;181:6958–6968. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.22.6958-6968.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Uguru GC, Stephens KE, Stead JA, Towle JE, Baumberg S, McDowall KJ. Transcriptional activation of the pathway-specific regulator of the actinorhodin biosynthetic genes in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;58:131–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04817.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ryding NJ, Anderson TB, Champness WC. Regulation of the Streptomyces coelicolor calcium-dependent antibiotic by absA, encoding a cluster-linked two-component system. J. Bacteriol. 2002;184:794–805. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.3.794-805.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hong SK, Kito M, Beppu T, Horinouchi S. Phosphorylation of the AfsR product, a global regulatory protein for secondarymetabolite formation in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) J. Bacteriol. 1991;173:2311–2318. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.7.2311-2318.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chater KF. Curing baldness activates antibiotic production. Chem. Biol. 2013;20:1199–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Horinouchi S, Hara O, Beppu T. Cloning of a pleiotropic gene that positively controls biosynthesis of A-factor, actinorhodin, and prodigiosin in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and Streptomyces lividans. J. Bacteriol. 1983;155:1238–1248. doi: 10.1128/jb.155.3.1238-1248.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Horinouchi S. AfsR as an integrator of signals that are sensed by multiple serine/threonine kinases in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003;30:462–467. doi: 10.1007/s10295-003-0063-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.White J, Bibb M. bldA dependence of undecylprodigiosin production in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) involves a pathwayspecific regulatory cascade. J. Bacteriol. 1997;179:627–633. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.3.627-633.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McKenzie NL, Nodwell JR. Phosphorylated AbsA2 negatively regulates antibiotic production in Streptomyces coelicolor through interactions with pathway-specific regulatory gene promoters. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:5284–5292. doi: 10.1128/JB.00305-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.van der Heul HU, Bilyk BL, McDowall KJ, Seipke RF, van Wezel GP. Regulation of antibiotic production in actinobacteria: new perspectives from the post-genomic era. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018;35:575–604. doi: 10.1039/C8NP00012C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jin XM, Choi MY, Tsevelkhoroloo M, Park U, Suh JW, Hong SK. SCO6992, a protein with β-glucuronidase activity, complements a mutation at the absR locus and promotes antibiotic biosynthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021;31:1591–1600. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2108.08001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anderson TB, Brian P, Champness WC. Genetic and transcriptional analysis of absA, an antibiotic gene cluster-linked twocomponent system that regulates multiple antibiotics in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol. Microbiol. 2001;39:553–566. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mazodier P, Petter R, Thompson C. Intergeneric conjugation between Escherichia coli and Streptomyces species. J. Bacteriol. 1989;71:3583–3585. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.6.3583-3585.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sambrook J, Russell DW. 3rd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kieser H, Bibb MJ, Buttner MJ, Chater FK, Hopwood DA. Practical Streptomyces Genetics. The John Innes Foundation; Norwich, UK: 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF. PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:1541–1546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337542100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yindeeyoungyeon W, Schell MA. Footprinting with an automated capillary DNA sequencer. Biotechniques. 2000;29:1034–1036. doi: 10.2144/00295st05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Newman JD, Russell MM, Fan L, Wang YX, Gonzalez-Gutierrez G, van Kessel JC. The DNA binding domain of the Vibrio vulnificus SmcR transcription factor is flexible and binds diverse DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:5967–5984. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Engebrecht J, Nealson K, Silverman M. Bacterial bioluminescence: isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri. Cell. 1983;32:773–781. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fuqua C, Greenberg EP. Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;3:685–695. doi: 10.1038/nrm907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fuqua C, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996;50:727–751. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.50.1.727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patankar AV, González JE. Orphan LuxR regulators of quorum sensing. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009;33:739–756. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00163.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Boos W, Shuman H. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1998;62:204–229. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.62.1.204-229.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ. Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. EMBO J. 1982;1:945–951. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01276.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Raibaud O, Vidal-Ingigliardi D, Richet EA. Complex nucleoprotein structure involved in activation of transcription of two divergent Escherichia coli promoters. J. Mol. Biol. 1989;205:471–485. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90218-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maris AE, Sawaya MR, Kaczor-Grzeskowiak M, Jarvis MR, Bearson SM, Kopka ML, et al. Dimerization allows DNA target site recognition by the NarL response regulator. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2022;9:771–778. doi: 10.1038/nsb845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wilson DJ, Xue Y, Reynolds KE, Sherman DH. Characterization and analysis of the PikD regulatory factor in the pikromycin biosynthetic pathway of Streptomyces venezuelae. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:3468–3475. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.11.3468-3475.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Aparicio JF, Molnár I, Schwecke T, König A, Haydock SF, Khaw LE, et al. Organisation of the biosynthetic gene cluster for rapamycin in Streptomyces hygroscopicus: analysis of the enzymatic domains in the modular polyketide synthase. Gene. 1996;169:9–16. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00800-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sekurova ON, Brautaset T, Sletta H, Borgos SEF, Jakobsen OM, Ellingsen TE, et al. In vivo analysis of the regulatory genes in the nystatin biosynthetic gene cluster of Streptomyces noursei ATCC 11455 reveals their differential control over antibiotic biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:1345–1354. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.5.1345-1354.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hur YA, Choi SS, Sherman DH, Kim ES. Identification of TmcN as a pathway-specific positive regulator of tautomycetin biosynthesis in Streptomyces sp.CK4412. Microbiology. 2008;54:2912–2919. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/018903-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.He X, Li R, Pan Y, Liu G, Tan H. SanG, a transcriptional activator, controls nikkomycin biosynthesis through binding to the sanN-sanO intergenic region in Streptomyces ansochromogenes. Microbiology. 2010;156:828–837. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.033605-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mo X, Wang Z, Wang B, Ma J, Huang H, Tian X, Zhang S, et al. Cloning and characterization of the biosynthetic gene cluster of the bacterial RNA polymerase inhibitor tirandamycin from marine-derived Streptomyces sp. SCSIO1666. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;406:341–347. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Carmody M, Byrne B, Murphy B, Breen C, Lynch S, Flood E, et al. Analysis and manipulation of amphotericin biosynthetic genes by means of modified phage KC515 transduction techniques. Gene. 2004;343:107–115. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Santos-Aberturas J, Vicente CM, Payero TD, Martín-Sánchez L, Cañibano C, Martín JF, et al. Hierarchical control on polyene macrolide biosynthesis: PimR modulates pimaricin production via the PAS-LuxR transcriptional activator PimM. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Guerra SM, Rodríguez-García A, Santos-Aberturas J, Vicente CM, Payero TD, Martín JF, et al. LAL regulators SCO0877 and SCO7173 as pleiotropic modulators of phosphate starvation response and actinorhodin biosynthesis in Streptomyces coelicolor. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Guo J, Zhao J, Li L, Chen Z, Wen Y, Li J. The pathway-specific regulator AveR from Streptomyces avermitilis positively regulates avermectin production while it negatively affects oligomycin biosynthesis. Mol. Genet. Genomics. 2010;283:123–133. doi: 10.1007/s00438-009-0502-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hackl S, Bechthold A. The Gene bldA, a regulator of morphological differentiation and antibiotic production in Streptomyces. Arch. Pharm. (Weinheim) 2015;348:455–462. doi: 10.1002/ardp.201500073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






