TABLE 1.
Summary of included articles (n = 20).
| References | Type of study | Term used | Number of included articles | Study population |
| Bender et al. (48) | Scoping review | Intimate partner violence, teen dating violence | 16 | Not specified |
| Caridade et al. (49) | Other | Cyber dating violence | 44 | Three groups; adolescent,1 youth, students (including college students) |
| Dardis et al. (45) | Literature review | IPV and DV interchangeably | Unknown number of articles reviewed | Adolescents or young adults 12–25 |
| Fernet et al. (44) | Systematic review | IPV | 13 | Three distinct populations of interest; fully adult samples, emerging adult samples (college) and adolescent samples. Women participants ranged in age 12–54, mean age of 24.74 |
| Goncy (52) | Meta-analysis | Dating violence | 66 | Adolescents and young adults.2 |
| Goncy et al. (53) | Meta-analysis | Dating aggression | 70 | Adolescents and young adults.3 |
| Hébert et al. (54) | Meta-analysis | Dating violence | 87 | Adolescents and emerging adults4 |
| Johnson et al. (46) | Systematic review | Dating violence | 20 | Six of the studies focused on adolescents, and five of the studies included adolescents and emerging adults. |
| Johnson et al. (50) | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Physical dating violence | 13 | Adolescents and emerging adults5 (college samples) |
| Joly and Connelly (58) | Systematic review | Dating violence | 21 | High-risk groups of girls and women |
| Leen et al. (42) | Standardized approach across the European research team to ensure a comprehensive and consistent review process. | Intimate partner violence, dating violence categories | 40, although only 12 met the inclusion criteria for the risk factor review. | 12–18 years6 |
| Lyons and Rabie (43) | Literature review | Adolescent dating abuse/domestic violence/intimate partner violence | Not specified | 11–16 years old7 |
| Malhi et al. (57) | Scoping review | Adolescent dating violence | 16 | Individuals aged 10–248 |
| Park et al. (22) | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Dating violence | 371 variables selected from 25 studies and coded for analysis. | All subjects were teenagers or young adults |
| Rothman et al. (55) | Literature review of unspecified type. Does have methodology (inclusion/exclusion, databases, etc.) | Dating violence | 28 articles | Only seven studies used high school samples9 |
| Spencer et al. (47) | Meta-analysis | Teen dating violence | 37 | Adolescents 13–19 |
| Storer et al. (51) | QIMS methodology | Adolescent dating abuse, interpersonal dating violence | 17 | Samples were racially diverse, and most samples included high school participants with fewer comprised of only middle school samples.10 |
| Taquette and Monteiro (7) | Bibliographic review | Adolescent dating violence, they also use intimate partner violence | 35 | Adolescents11 |
| Vagi et al. (20) | No specific methodology, but the article does outline a method for article selection and extraction. | Adolescent dating violence | 20 | Not specified |
| Zych et al. (56) | Systematic review and meta-analysis | Dating violence | 23 | Children and adolescents up to 21 years of age |
1Only one study included adolescents of different ethnicities. Sample included middle and high-school students (13), students in general (4), and youth and young people in the community. Also, eight studies presented data on the sexual orientation of the participants.
2There were ages 12–18 (21 articles); more than half were young adult samples (50).
4The 22% of the studies were exclusively comprised of female participants; 29% examined female and male participants separately; 47% combined results for males and females. The 62% of the samples were comprised of adolescents, and 5% were comprised of both adolescents and emerging adults.
5Studies of adolescents had more diverse samples; black and Hispanic primarily. Ages 11–21. Street-involved, justice-involved, pregnant, parenting, involved with Child Protective Services, and diagnosed with mental health issues.
6Adolescent sample, although some of the included studies had samples with young adults (29 years old).
7They use the terms teenagers, young person, adolescents interchangeably. Used only heterosexual relationships.
8Study spans early, middle, and late adolescence.
9Studies that used samples that exceeded the age range of 11–21 years were included if the mean age of respondents was 21 years or less at the time that DVP was measured.
10Although the samples were racially diverse, no Asian, American Indian or Alaska American populations were included.
11Youngest sample is 11 years old. No sample is older than 18 or Grade 12.