Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 17;15(9):2224–2233. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2224-2233

Table-5.

Univariate logistic regression of exposure to milk consumption in Sidi Kacem province (n = 1283).

Factors Total Seroreactivity No. (%) OR (95% CI) p-value
Consumption of milk
Cow’s milk*
 No 362 89 (24.59) Reference
 Yes 921 337 (36.59) 1.77 (1.34–2.33) <0.0001
Sheep’s milk
 No 1273 420 (32.99) Reference
 Yes 10 6 (60.00) 3.05 (0.85–10.86) 0.071
Goat’s milk*
 No 1232 402 (32.63) Reference
 Yes 51 24 (47.06) 1.83 (1.04–3.22) 0.032
Industrial milk
 No 1093 362 (33.12) Reference
 Yes 190 64 (33.68) 1.02 (0.74–1.42) 0.879
Farm milk*
 No 372 88 (23.66) Reference
 Yes 891 338 (37.93) 1.97 (1.50–2.60) <0.0001
Informal milk*
 No 919 261 (28.40) Reference
 Yes 364 165 (45.33) 2.09 (1.62–2.69) <0.0001
Raw milk*
 No 635 193 (30.39) Reference
 Yes 648 233 (35.96) 1.28 (1.02–1.62) 0.034
Boiled milk**
 No 604 275 (45.53) Reference
 Yes 679 151 (22.24) 0.34 (0.27–0.43) <0.0001

OR=Odds ratio, 95% CI=95% Confidence interval. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant,

*

Risk Factor,

**

Protector Factor