. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022 Oct 19;69(11):3472–3483. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3170922

TABLE I.

Design parameters and Fontan hemodynamic responses of optimal designs. Top-ranked DO design, top-ranked OUU design, and the best original DO design for each patient are presented.

Optimal designs	Design parameters										Responses
Optimal designs	a (mm)	b (mm)	α_s (rad)	β_s (rad)	ΔL_s	D ₁₂	D ₄₅	υ₁ (mm)	υ₂ (mm)	θ (rad)	P (HFD_balanced)	$E (iPL)$	$E (% WSS) (%)$
F₁, top-ranked DO	12.29	10.44	1	−0.66	85.54	1	1	40.74	14.67	3.37	0.99	0.026	0.97
F₁, top-ranked OUU	11.44	10.02	1	−0.66	84.50	1	0.75	40.74	14.67	3.37	1	0.023	0.98
F₁, best original DO	10.23	7.77	0.45	−0.52	86.32	0.30	0.92	21.79	38.05	3.83	0.92	0.028	1.62
F₂, top-ranked DO	7.35	9.57	0.76	−0.03	186.36	0.36	0.98	39.62	17.57	5.15	0.92	0.022	3.05
F₂, top-ranked OUU	8.49	10	0.01	0.53	186.36	0.30	0.85	39.62	17.27	5.35	0.96	0.019	2.83
F₂, best original DO	9.84	7.57	1	−0.38	166.54	1	0.25	38.82	11.60	1.02	0.86	0.017	2.63
F₃, top-ranked DO	8.61	10	1	−0.06	73.11	1	0.48	37.99	35.89	4.36	1	0.014	0.91
F₃, top-ranked OUU	8.61	10	1	−0.06	73.11	1	0.48	37.99	35.89	4.36	1	0.014	0.91
F₃, best original DO	7.82	6.99	0.64	−0.26	58.21	0.48	0.21	44.60	29.38	4.07	0.99	0.024	0.76
F₄, top-ranked DO	8.32	9.65	0.96	0.03	146.37	0.57	0.47	46.75	22.85	3.28	0.93	0.015	3.5
F₄, top-ranked OUU	8.32	10.65	1	0.03	146.37	0.57	0.47	46.75	22.85	3.28	0.97	0.014	3.8
F₄, best original DO	8.85	9.11	0.79	−0.93	127.01	0.1	1	8.89	21.99	0.96	0.48	0.018	5.5