Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 18;7(43):38869–38881. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04592

Table 3. Family Linear Fits for Experimental and Predicted EACN Versus Number of Carbon Atoms n.

family exp. fita exp. R2 GM fitb GM R2 NN fitc NN R2 EACNexp(10)d
n-alkylcyclohexanes 1.28n–5.7 (7) 1 1.25n–5.6 (6) 1 1.19n–4.5 1 7.3
alk-1-enes 1.05n–4.6 (4) 1 1.06n–4.7 (9) 1 1.16n–5.6 1 6.4
central ethers 0.92n–4.9 (5) 0.99 0.89n–4.5 (8) 1 0.98n–5.5 1 4.9
1-chloroalkanes 1.07n–7.1 (4) 1 1.03n–6.6 (9) 1 0.84n–4.2 0.99 3.9
ethyl n-alkanoates 0.78n–7.2 (4) 1 0.77n–7.2 (9) 0.99 1.13n–11.8 1 0.8
alk-1-ynes 0.95n–9.4 (4) 1 0.93n–9.1 (9) 1 0.70n–6.6 0.98 0.6
n-alkylbenzenes 0.93n–8.9 (4) 1 1.05n–10.6 (9) 0.99 0.98n–9.7 0.99 0.1
nitriles 0.53n–5.9 (3) 0.99 0.62n–6.9 (10) 0.98 0.64n–6.9 1 –0.9
n-alkan-2-ones 0.70n–9.1 (4) 1 0.66n–8.5 (9) 0.99 1.11n–11.8 0.98 –2.1
a

In brackets, number of points used for the experimental fits.

b

In brackets, number of points used for the GM fits.

c

Number of points used is the same as for the GM fits.

d

EACNexp calculated with n = 10.