TABLE 3.

Indirect and conditional indirect effects.

Indirect effect	Follower epistemic motivation	Path coefficient	95% CI
Leader workplace anxiety—Follower cognitive interference– Task performance		–0.064*	[–0.107, –0.029]
	Low	–0.055*	[–0.093, –0.021]
	High	–0.023*	[–0.048, –0.006]
	Difference	0.032*	[0.012, 0.068]
Leader workplace anxiety—Follower emotional exhaustion – Contextual performance		–0.056*	[–0.100, –0.025]
	Low	–0.027	[–0.069, 0.001]
	High	–0.022	[–0.051, –0.002]
	Difference	0.004	[–0.023, 0.031]
Leader workplace anxiety—Follower cognitive interference– Contextual performance		–0.004	[–0.021, 0.036]
Leader workplace anxiety—Follower emotional exhaustion– Task performance		–0.007	[–0.034, 0.021]

n = 228. 95% CI, bias-corrected 95% confidence interval with 1,000 resamples. *p < 0.05.