Comments on revised manuscript

The authors amended the manuscript, yet some important concerns they did not really address. I really think the manuscript should be published but the lack of assembly quality control, missing information about RNA sequencing, and the way they conducted the phylogenetic analyses (super matrix rather than multi-locus) should be revised again before it can be published. I would like to urge the authors to have a look at these issues again, and I really do not want to be too picky but I have the feeling, that this manuscript can still be improved quite a bit.