Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;24:52. doi: 10.1186/s12968-022-00885-x

Table 2.

Cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation of the participants

LV end-diastolic volume (mL) 153 [125–216]
LV end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2) 87 [75–126]
LV end-systolic volume (mL) 70 [47–125]
LV end-systolic volume (mL/m2) 42 [29–73]
LV mass (g) 108 [89–138]
LV mass index (g/m2) 63 [53–78]
LVEF (%) 53 [41–62]
  Reduced LVEF (< 40%) 25 (22%)
Presence of LV LGE, n (%) 76 (67%)
LV LGE mass (g) 6 [0–13]
LV LGE mass (%) 5 [0–10]
Presence of LV aneurysm, n (%) 38 (34%)
  Apical 35 (31%)
  Inferolateral 3 (3%)
RV end-diastolic volume (mL) 114 [93–132]
RV end-diastolic volume index (mL/m2) 46 [33–63]

LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, LV left ventricular, RV right ventricular