Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;2022(11):CD013403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013403.pub2

Comparison 3. Serious adverse events.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
3.1 Risk of serious adverse events compared with placebo by drug 10   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.1.1 Avoralstat 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 7.80]
3.1.2 Berotralstat 3 128 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.02, 24.03]
3.1.3 C1‐INH‐nf 1 48 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Not estimable
3.1.4 C1‐INH(SC) 1 87 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.01, 8.14]
3.1.5 pdC1‐INH 1 128 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.54 [0.09, 3.10]
3.1.6 rhC1‐INH 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.06, 34.66]
3.1.7 Lanadelumab 2 162 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.08, 10.39]
3.2 Risk of serious adverse events – head‐to‐head trials 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
3.2.1 Short‐term trials 1 86 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.01, 7.96]
3.2.2 Long‐term trials 1 133 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.12 [0.32, 4.01]