Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;2022(11):CD013403. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013403.pub2

APeX‐1.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: dose‐ranging, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, parallel, randomised trial
Exclusions postrandomisation: none reported
Losses to follow‐up: 2 participants never received a trial regimen or entered any diary data and 3 discontinued the trial regimen owing to an AE or laboratory abnormality
Duration of study: 1 year (trial initiated in August 2016, the last participant observation in August 2017)
Unit of randomisation: participant
Participants Country: international (86 patients screened from 26 sites across Europe, Canada and Australia)
Setting: outpatient
Number: 77 participants underwent randomisation, 75 received berotralstat (BCX7353) or placebo, 72 completed the trial; 23 participants received placebo, 7 received berotralstat 62.5 mg, 14 received berotralstat 125 mg, 15 received berotralstat 250 mg, and 18 received berotralstat 350 mg
Age (mean): 44.5 (SD 12.5) years
Sex: male 29 (38.7%); female 46 (61.3%)
Inclusion criteria: adults aged 18–70 years with Type I or II HAE with history of ≥ 2 angioedema attacks per month for 3 consecutive months within a 6‐month period
Exclusion criteria: suspected to have C1 inhibitor resistance or using a C1 inhibitor, androgens, or tranexamic acid for prophylaxis of attacks within 7 days before screening
Interventions Berotralstat 62.5 mg once daily
Berotralstat 125 mg once daily
Berotralstat 250 mg once daily
Berotralstat 350 mg once daily
Placebo once daily
Treatment duration: 28 days
Outcomes Number of attacks (overall, by location), change in AE‐QoL, AEs
Funding Sponsored by BioCryst Pharmaceuticals.
Declarations of interest Numerous conflicts of interest among study authors; see disclosure form at www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa1716995/suppl_file/nejmoa1716995_disclosures.pdf
Notes Funded by BioCryst, but study performed externally.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomisation not stated.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Allocation concealment not stated.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) Low risk Double‐blind.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Unclear risk Blinding of outcome assessment not stated.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk All participants completed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes in protocol were reported on.
Other bias Low risk None.