Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 6;104:109989. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109989

Table 1.

Demographic information of subjects in each site.

Site Scanner Male Subjects
Age Age



N ASD Mean SD TD Mean SD P*
CALTECH SIEMENS Trio 16 7 23.5 3.5 9 23.3 5.2 0.95
CMU SIEMENS Verio 17 8 23.6 3.4 9 25.6 4.4 0.30
KKI Philips Achieva 36 15 10.0 1.3 21 10.3 1.3 0.58
Leuven 1 Philips INTERA 27 13 22.1 4.2 14 23.4 3.0 0.34
Leuven 2 Philips INTERA 21 10 13.8 1.5 11 14.1 1.5 0.73
Max Munich SIEMENS Verio 29 12 17.7 8.4 17 23.3 6.3 0.05
NYU Philips Allegra 131 63 13.5 5.8 68 16.4 6.4 < 0.05*
OHSU SIEMENS Trio 23 10 11.3 2.3 13 10.2 1.0 0.12
OLIN SIEMENS Allegra 27 14 15.8 2.9 13 17.2 3.8 0.30
PITT SIEMENS Allegra 36 18 17.8 6.0 18 20.2 7.4 0.30
SBL Philips INTERA 7 2 23.5 5.0 5 27.8 3.7 0.25
SDSU GE MR750 20 7 14.7 1.9 13 14.7 1.6 0.95
Stanford GE Signa 22 12 10.2 1.5 10 10.2 1.8 0.99
Trinity Philips Achieva 36 15 16.5 3.1 21 17.4 3.9 0.51
UCLA 1 SIEMENS Trio 59 34 13.2 2.5 25 13.1 2.3 0.86
UCLA 2 SIEMENS Trio 21 12 12.5 1.8 9 12.2 1.3 0.64
UM 1 GE Signa 67 32 12.6 2.4 35 13.4 3.2 0.26
UM 2 GE Signa 28 11 14.7 1.6 17 17.1 4.3 0.10
USM SIEMENS Trio 87 50 21.1 5.8 37 20.8 6.9 0.82
Yale SIEMENS Trio 35 16 13.4 2.8 19 12.3 2.9 0.26

N = number of subjects; SD = Standard Deviation; P* were calculated by Student's t-test; P* values survived the pre-defined statistical threshold of 0.05 were denoted in bold.