Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 6;104:109989. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109989

Table 6.

Comparison with other ASD classification research based on MRI data of ABIDE dataset.

Ref ASD group
TD group
sMRI features Classification
method
Classification
accuracy
Note
Age Gender Size Age Gender Size
Haar et al. (2014) 6–35 Male only 453 6–35 Male only 453 Regional volume, surface area and cortical thickness LDA, QDA < 60% Performed two analyses, based on strict/relaxed criteria.
Sabuncu et al. (2015) 17.8 ± 7.4 88.6% Male 325 17.9 ± 7.4 88.6% Male 325 Regional volume, surface area and cortical thickness SVM, NAF, RVM < 60% None.
Katuwal et al. (2015) Unknown Male only 373 Unknown Male only 361 Volume, surface area, cortical thickness, thickness std., mean curvature, Gaussian curvature, folding index RF, GBM, SVM 60% None.
Katuwal et al. (2016) 17.9 ± 8.7 Male only 361 18.1 ± 8.2 Male only 373 Curvature and folding index GBM 60% Adding VIQ and age to morphometric features.
Zheng et al. (2019) Depends on site Depends on site 66 Depends on site Depends on site 66 Seven morphological features of each of the 360 brain regions, elastic network, multi-feature-based networks SVM 78.63% High-functioning adults with ASD.
This study 6–34 Male only 364 6–34 Male only 381 Patch-based features derived from hippocampus Six ensemble classifiers > 80% None.

LDA = Linear Discriminant Classifier; QDA = Quadratic Discriminant Classifier; SVM = Support Vector Machine; NAF = Neighborhood Approximation Forest; RVM = Bayesian Relevance Vector Machine; RF = Random Forest; GBM = Gradient Boosting Machine.