Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;50(1):151–159. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01231-0

Table 1.

Key findings regarding sustainability by CCM element

CCM elements Status immediately post-implementation
(Sullivan et al., 2021)
Key sustainability themes
Work role redesign

– BHIP meetings happening more frequently

– Changes in team membership to improve continuity of care (e.g. care coordinator roles, staffing for orientation groups)

– Conversations about ways to improve team functioning

– Improved communication within the team

– Variable sustainability of care coordinator roles

– Veteran orientation groups had mostly been discontinued

Patient self-management support

– EBP delivery supported

– Patients invited to attend BHIP team meetings

– New educational materials for patients created and used

– Continued emphasis on delivery of EBPs

– Limited sustainability of clinic brochures or guidance documents to orient Veterans to available mental health services

Provider decision support

– Clinicians trainings in EBPs

– Some evidence supporting improvements in communication between providers

– Teams reported some increase in understanding about providers’ areas of expertise

– Continued emphasis on delivery of EBPs (consistent with Patient Self-Management Support immediately above)

– Continued attention to referral processes to other clinics; challenges with maintaining consistent within-team referral processes

Clinical information systems

– Since baseline, more conversation about implementing patient panels

– Since baseline, more discussion about ways to incorporate measurement-based care

– Continued or even expanded emphasis on patient-level MBC

– More difficulty establishing/maintaining aggregated data across the team’s panel of Veterans

Linkages to community resources – More shared information about community resources developed and utilized across BHIP teams (e.g. brochures) – Variable strategies for developing, maintaining, and documenting linkages, ranging from relatively idiographic/clinician-specific to more systematic, team-wide approaches
Organization and leadership support

– Variable support from leaders ranging from full support to active non-support

– Staff mention challenges obtaining additional resources

– Variable emphasis on CCM-based care from mental health leadership

– Most salient components from frontline clinician perspective were blocking time for BHIP meetings and appropriately staffing BHIP teams