Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;2022:3933252. doi: 10.1155/2022/3933252

Table 2.

Risk of bias of the included studies.

ID Study Score
1 B. Feng [38] U Y U Y Y U U Y Y Y 6
2 C. Cheng [36] U U U U U U U Y Y Y 3
3 G. Li [32] U U U Y U U U U Y Y 3
4 H. Hao [28] Y Y U U U U U Y Y U 4
5 H. Yang [45] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
6 H. Yu [49] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
7 K. Chen [39] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
8 K. Hou [29] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
9 K. R. Nalamolu [27] U Y U Y U U U Y Y U 4
10 L. Xu [33] U U U Y U U U Y Y Y 4
11 M. Han [40] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
12 Q. Pan [43] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
13 W. Wang [44] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
14 X. Huang [26] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
15 X. Li [34] U Y U U U U U Y Y Y 4
16 X. Li [42] U Y U Y U U Y U Y Y 5
17 X. Liu [35] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
18 Y. AN [48] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
19 Y. Ye [46] Y Y Y Y Y U Y Y Y Y 9
20 Y. Zhao [30] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
21 Y. Zhao [47] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
22 Z. Hou [41] U Y U Y U U U U Y Y 4
23 Z. Pan [31] U Y U Y U U U Y Y Y 5
24 Z. Zhang [37] U U U Y U U Y U Y Y 4

①: Was the allocation sequence adequately generated and applied; ②: were the groups similar at baseline or were they adjusted for confounders in the analysis; ③: was the allocation adequately concealed; ④: were the animals randomly housed during the experiment; ⑤: were the caregivers and/or investigators blinded from knowledge which intervention each animal received during the experiment; ⑥: were animals selected at random for outcome assessment; ⑦: was the outcome assessor blinded; ⑧: were incomplete outcome data adequately addressed; ⑨: are reports of the study free of selective outcome reporting; ⑩: was the study apparently free of other problems that could result in high risk of bias. Y: yes; N: no; U: uncertain.