Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 24;179(11):853–861. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21111175

Table 2:

Enrichment of recurrent CNVs in EOP relative to ASD and Unselected Control Cohorts

ASD Contrast ASD carriers EOP carriers OR 95%CI P-value
EOP (N=137) 193 11 2.42 1.16-4.57 0.02
EOP without ASD (N=90) 193 6 1.79 0.63-4.11 0.16
EOP without ID (N=120) 193 7 1.72 0.67-3.72 0.20
EOP without schizophrenia (N=99) 193 8 2.43 1.01-5.10 0.02
EOP < 13 years old (N=101) 193 6 1.75 0.62-4.02 0.17
Control Contrast Control carriers EOP carriers OR 95%CI P-value
EOP (N=137) 273 11 5.19 2.50-9.75 2 × 10−5
EOP without ASD (N=90) 273 6 3.83 1.36-8.77 6 × 10−3
EOP without ID (N=120) 273 7 3.68 1.43-7.94 4 × 10−3
EOP without schizophrenia (N=99) 273 8 5.22 2.17-10.88 3 × 10−4
EOP < 13 years old (N=101) 273 6 3.75 1.33-8.58 7 × 10−3

Legend: Odds ratios are computed using Fisher’s exact test. Significant p-values are in bold (≤ 0.05). Sensitivity analysis involved excluding individuals in the EOP sample: 1) with co-occurring ASD; 2) with co-occurring ID; 3) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia; or 5) with psychosis onset prior to age 13. EOP: early-onset psychosis; ASD: autism spectrum disorder (N=5,540); Controls: unselected population (N=16,504); ID: intellectual disability; N: number of individuals; OR: Odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence intervals.