Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 24;179(11):853–861. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.21111175

Table 3:

Genome-wide CRS Differences in EOP relative to ASD and Unselected Control Cohorts

Deletions Duplications
ASD Contrast ASD
CRS
EOP
CRS
OR 95%CI p-value ASD
CRS
EOP
CRS
OR 95%CI p-value
EOP (N=137) 0.86 1.39 1.03 1.01-1.06 0.33 1.88 1.63 0.98 0.96-1.01 0.61
EOP without ASD (N=90) 0.86 1.00 1.01 0.97-1.04 0.89 1.88 1.42 0.96 0.93-1.00 0.48
EOP without ID (N=120) 0.86 0.53 0.94 0.89-0.99 0.42 1.88 1.63 0.98 0.95-1.01 0.64
EOP without schizophrenia (N=99) 0.86 1.59 1.04 1.02-1.07 0.24 1.88 1.76 0.99 0.96-1.02 0.78
EOP < 13 years old (N=101) 0.86 1.25 1.03 1.00-1.06 0.56 1.88 1.34 0.95 0.92-0.99 0.42
Control Contrast Control
CRS
EOP
CRS
OR 95%CI p-value Control
CRS
EOP
CRS
OR 95%CI p-value
EOP (N=137) 0.23 1.39 1.30 1.26-1.35 9x10−8 0.94 1.63 1.09 1.06-1.12 0.02
EOP without ASD (N=90) 0.23 1.00 1.24 1.19-1.30 3x10−4 0.94 1.42 1.07 1.04-1.11 0.17
EOP without ID (N=120) 0.23 0.53 1.19 1.12-1.27 0.04 0.94 1.63 1.09 1.06-1.12 0.03
EOP without schizophrenia (N=99) 0.23 1.59 1.31 1.27-1.36 3 × 10−7 0.94 1.76 1.10 1.07-1.13 0.02
EOP < 13 years old (N=101) 0.23 1.25 1.34 1.28-1.39 4 × 10−7 0.94 1.34 1.06 1.03-1.10 0.25

Legend: Effect of gene dosage on EOP risk. Odds ratios are computed using logistic regressions including the CNV risk score (CRS; sum of 1/LOEUF score) for genes totally encompassed in deletions and duplications as the two main explanatory variables. OR represents the mean risk conferred by a deletion or a duplication including 1 intolerant gene (a LOEUF ≤ 0.35). All models were adjusted for sex. CRS presented in the table are the mean score per samples. Sensitivity analysis involved excluding individuals in the EOP sample: 1) with co-occurring ASD; 2) with co-occurring ID; 3) with a diagnosis of schizophrenia; or 5) with psychosis onset prior to age 13. EOP: early-onset psychosis; ASD: autism spectrum disorder cohort (n=5,540); ID: intellectual disability; Controls: unselected population (n=16,50); LOEUF: Loss-of-function observed/expected upper fraction; OR: Odds ratio; 95%CI: 95% Confidence interval