Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Nov 1;28(21):4669–4676. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1113

Table 1.

Patient and tumor characteristics

Patient and Tumor Characteristics Training Set Testing Set
Cases BPM P-value Cases BPM P-value
Number of Subjects, N 101 134 118 56
Age, average (min-max) 59 (23–85) 57 (30–83) 0.14 61 (36–86) 55 (33–79) 0.009
Menopausal Status, N (%)
Pre 21 (20.8%) 39 (29.1%) 0.17 19 (16.1%) 18 (32.1%) 0.02
Post 80 (79.2%) 95 (70.9%) 99 (83.8%) 38 (67.8%)
Race, N (%)
White 83 (82.2%) 104 (77.6%) 0.18 87 (73.7%) 42 (75%) 0.52
Black 5 (5%) 3 (2.2%) 9 (7.6%) 9 (16.1%)
Asian 2 (2%) 3 (2.2%) 13 (11%) 1 (1.8%)
American Indian - 1 (0.7%) - -
Pacific Islander - - 9 (7.6%) 4 (7.1%)
Unknown 11 (10.9%) 23 (17.2%) - -
Stage, N (%)
Stage I and II 39 (38.6%) - 20 (16.9%) -
Stage III and IV 62 (61.4%) - 98 (83.1%) -
Histological Subtype, N (%)
Serous 69 (68.3%) - 114 (96.6%) -
Non-Serous 32 (31.7%) - 1 (0.8%) -
Unknown 3 (2.54%)
ROMA, median (25th/75th Percentiles) 86.85 (36.85–98.03) 11.14 (6.64–20.66) <0.0001 89.51 (70.55–96.95) 13.66 (6.42–18.56) <0.0001

individuals with benign pelvic masses (BPM)

Statistical significance was determined by Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test or χ2 tests for trend for categorical variables. 2-sided p-values are reported.