Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 14;224(10):1796–1805. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab207

Table 5.

Association Between Zygosity at HLA Class II Loci and HCC Among Liver Cirrhotic Patients in the REVEAL-HBV Cohort in Taiwan

HLA Zygosity Cirrhotic HCC (n = 138) Liver Cirrhosis (n = 201) HR Adjusted for Age, Sex, and Principal Components (95% CI)a
Class II loci
 Heterozygous at all loci 69 (50.0) 107 (53.2) Ref.
 Homozygous in at least 1 locus 69 (50.0) 94 (46.8) 1.09 (.78–1.52)
  Number of homozygous
   1 46 (33.3) 70 (34.8) 1.08 (.74–1.58)
   2 12 (8.7) 14 (7.0) 0.92 (.49–1.72)
   3 11 (8.0) 10 (5.0) 1.37 (.72–2.60)
  P trend .52
 HLA-DPB1
  Heterozygote 87 (63.0) 128 (63.7) Ref.
  Homozygote 51 (37.0) 73 (36.3) 1.08 (.76–1.53)
 HLA-DQB1
  Heterozygote 106 (76.8) 166 (82.6) Ref.
  Homozygote 32 (23.2) 35 (17.4) 1.13 (.76–1.68)
 HLA-DRB1
  Heterozygote 118 (85.5) 181 (90.0) Ref.
  Homozygote 20 (14.5) 20 (10.0) 1.08 (.66–1.76)

Data are No. (%).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; REVEAL-HBV, Risk Evaluation of Viral Load Elevation and Associated Liver Disease/Cancer-Hepatitis B Virus study.

aHRs and 95% CIs were estimated from Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-in-study as time scale and were adjusted for sex, age (in categories, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–79 years), and principal components. Follow-up started from the date of diagnosis of liver cirrhosis and censored at diagnosis of HCC, death, and end of follow-up (2016), whichever occurred first.