Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;162(4):899–919. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.026

Table 5.

Outcome Measures After Randomization for the INCS Arm∗ Compared With the Placebo Group With Respect to Changes Between Month 3 and Month 12 (Phase 2 of Study)

Outcome INCS
Placebo
Effect Size P Value
Month 3 Month 12 Change Month 3 to Month 12 Month 3 Month 12 Change Month 3 to Month 12
Primary outcomea
 OAHI (N/h)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.3 .47
 Median 3.4 3.6 0.1 3.1 4.3 1.0
 IQR 1.5 to 7.1 1.3 to 6.4 –3.3 to 2.5 1.5 to 9.2 1.7 to 8.9 –1.3 to 2.9
Secondary outcomesb
 Participant-performed behavior and executive function testing
 Conners Kiddie Continuous  Performance Test
 No. 37 37 37 29 29 29 0.2
 Mean 54.2 52.7 –1.5 53.0 52.9 –0.1
 95% CI 51.1 to 57.3 49.1 to 56.3 –4.4 to 1.4 49.8 to 56.2 48.7 to 57.1 –3.5 to 3.4
 Purdue Pegboard dominant hand
 No. 38 38 38 31 31 31 0.1
 Median –1.2 –1.0 0.1 –1.2 –1.3 –0.3
 IQR –1.8 to –0.5 –1.7 to 0.1 –0.5 to .8 –1.7 to 0.1 –2.3 to –0.3 –1.3 to 0.8
 Purdue Pegboard both hands
 No. 38 38 38 31 31 31 0.2
 Median –0.9 –0.9 0.1 –1.2 –1.0 –0.3
 IQR –1.7 to –0.2 –1.5 to –0.2 –0.8 to 0.7 –1.7 to –0.2 –1.7 to –0.4 –0.9 to 0.9
 Purdue Pegboard nondominant hands
 No. 38 38 38 31 31 31 0.1
 Median –1.1 –0.8 0.2 –1.1 –0.7 0.3
 IQR –1.6 to –0.2 –1.5 to –0.2 –0.6 to 0.9 –2.0 to –0.4 –1.8 to –0.1 –0.6 to 1.1
Caregiver-reported behavior and executive function
 CGI (caregiver)
 No. 37 37 37 32 32 32 0.2
 Median 5.0 5.0 –1.0 4.0 3.0 0.0
 IQR 3.0 to 9.0 1.0 to 8.0 –4.0 to 0.0 0.5 to 14.5 1.0 to 11.5 –1.5 to 1.0
 CBCL internalizing (caregiver)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.2
 Mean 50.7 49.9 –0.8 54.2 51.9 –2.2
 95% CI 48.0 to 53.4 47.0 to 52.8 –3.7 to 2.1 50.4 to 57.9 47.5 to 56.4 –5.4 to 0.9
 CBCL externalizing (caregiver)
 No. 32 32 32 32 32 32 0.3
 Mean 53.8 51.9 –1.9 51.3 52.0 0.7
 95% CI 49.9 to 57.7 48.5 to 55.3 –4.3 to 0.5 46.5 to 56.1 47.3 to 56.7 –2.5 to 3.9
 CBCL total problem (caregiver)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Mean 52.3 51.4 –0.9 52.4 51.2 –1.2
 95% CI 49.0 to 55.7 48.5 to 54.4 –3.4 to 1.6 47.8 to 57.0 46.0 to 56.4 –4.6 to 2.3
 CBCL attention subscale (caregiver)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Median 55.0 53.0 –0.5 53.0 52.5 0.0
 IQR 52.0 to 57.0 52.0 to 57.0 –3.0 to 1.0 51.0 to 65.0 50.0 to 63.0 –1.5 to 1.0
 BRIEF GEC (caregiver)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Median 44.5 42.0 –2.5 48.5 44.0 0.0
 IQR 42.0 to 58.0 39.0 to 56.0 –6.0 to 2.0 39.5 to 64.5 37.5 to 62.5 –7.5 to 3.0
Symptoms and health quality of life
 Modified Epworth Sleepiness Scale
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Median 8.5 8.0 0.0 7.5 6.5 –1.0
 IQR 3.0 to 12.0 4.0 to 11.0 –2.0 to 2.0 5.0 to 15.0 5.0 to 11.5 –3.5 to 2.5
 PSQ-SRBD scale
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.2
 Mean 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.4 –0.1
 95% CI 0.3 to 0.4 0.3 to 0.4 –0.1 to 0.0 0.4 to 0.5 0.3 to 0.5 –0.1 to 0.0
 PedsQL
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Median 81.5 86.4 2.2 74.5 77.2 1.1
 IQR 58.7 to 91.3 66.3 to 93.5 –4.3 to 12.0 57.6 to 93.5 56.5 to 90.2 –6.5 to 7.6
 OSA-18 (total score)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Median 39.5 35.5 –4.0 44.5 46.5 –0.5
 IQR 28.0 to 49.0 29.0 to 47.0 –13.0 to 6.0 34.0 to 69.0 28.5 to 66.0 –11.0.0 to 6.5
Nasal symptoms
 NOSE scale
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Median 2.0 2.0 –1.0 4.5 4.0 0.0
 IQR 1.0 to 7.0 1.0 to 6.0 –3.0 to 2.0 2.5 to 9.5 1.5 to 8.5 –3.0 to 2.0
Polysomnography
 % TST end-tidal CO2 > 50 mm Hg
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Median 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.7 0.0
 IQR 0.0 to 0.7 0.0 to 1.0 –0.1 to 0.2 0.1 to 1.6 0.0 to 3.7 –0.6 to 0.8
 Arousal index (N/h)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.3
 Median 10.5 9.9 –0.9 10.0 8.5 –0.9
 IQR 9.2 to 14.5 7.1 to 13.6 –3.1 to 2.2 6.9 to 13.8 7.5 to 12.9 –3.9 to 5.1
 (% TST) Stage 1
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Median 2.3 3.3 0.0 2.0 1.7 –0.1
 IQR 0.9 to 6.0 1.2 to 6.0 –2.1 to 3.0 0.6 to 3.9 1.2 to 2.9 –1.4 to 1.3
 Time in stage 2 (% TST)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.1
 Mean 40.1 42.6 2.5 43.0 46.1 3.1
 95% CI 37.2 to 43.0 39.6 to 45.6 –1.0 to 5.9 39.8 to 46.2 42.4 to 49.8 –0.9 to 7.1
 Time in stage N3 (% TST)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Median 34.1 31.3 –2.3 33.7 30.2 –2.6
 IQR 28.8 to 39.1 28.0 to 38.6 –7.5 to 4.8 26.8 to 37.8 22.8 to 35.5 –8.5 to 4.5
 Time in stage REM (% TST)
 No. 38 38 38 32 32 32 0.0
 Mean 21.8 21.1 –0.7 22.2 21.5 –0.7
 95% CI 20.1 to 23.6 19.0 to 23.3 –3.0 to 1.6 20.1 to 24.4 19.1 to 23.9 –3.5 to 2.0

All placebo participants in Phase 2 received INCS intervention during Phase 1 of the study (see Fig 1). Data are presented as mean ±SD, and as medians with IQRs for nonnormally distributed data. The P value is provided for the primary outcome only and is adjusted for the stratification factors of adjusted for the stratification factors of atopy/asthma, current use of inhaled corticosteroids for asthma (yes/no), obesity status, and seasonality (spring/summer vs autumn/winter). Effect sizes were calculated with the use of Cohen’s d, the ratio of the absolute difference in means, and the SD, and may be interpreted as follows: small, > 0.20 to 0.49; medium, 0.50 to 0.79; and large, ≥ 0.80. BRIEF GEC = Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Global Executive Composite; CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist; CGI = Conners Global Index; INCS = intranasal corticosteroids; IQR = interquartile range; NOSE = Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation; OAHI = obstructive apnea hypopnea index; OSA-18 = 18-item Obstructive Sleep Apnea assessment tool; PSQ-SRBD = Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire sleep-related breathing disorder scale; REM = rapid eye movement; TST = total sleep time.

a

Scores on the OAHI scale ranged from 0 to 29, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

b

Scores on the Conners Kiddie Continuous Performance Test scale ranged from 33 to 72, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Purdue Pegboard dominant hand scale ranged from –4 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Purdue Pegboard both hands scale ranged from –4 to 2, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Purdue Pegboard nondominant hand scale ranged from –4 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the CGI scale ranged from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the CBCL internalizing scale ranged from 29 to 81, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the CBCL externalizing scale ranged from 28 to 82, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the CBCL total problem scale ranged from 24 to 83, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the CBCL attention subscale scale ranged from 50 to 83, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the BRIEF GEC (caregiver) scale ranged from 31 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Modified Epworth Sleepiness Scale ranged from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the PSQ-SRBD scale ranged from 0 to 0, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the PedsQL scale ranged from 35 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the OSA-18 (total score) scale ranged from 18 to 97, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the NOSE scale ranged from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Time with end-tidal CO2 > 50 mm Hg (% TST) scale ranged from 0 to 81, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Arousal index scale ranged from 2 to 33, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Scores on the Time in stage 1 (% TST) scale ranged from 0 to 11. Scores on the Time in stage 2 (% TST) scale ranged from 18 to 71. Scores on the Time in stage 3 (% TST) scale ranged from 13 to 58. Scores on the Time in REM (% TST) scale ranged from 9 to 34.