Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;23:354. doi: 10.1186/s12882-022-02991-5

Table 1.

Logistic regression analysis of CRGs in the three GEO databases and the C-index

Gene Median Coefficient OR AUC 95% CI P value
ATP7A 6.705 0.313 1.871 0.536 0.428–0.645 0.388
ATP7B 6.996 0.511 2.777 0.680 0.582–0.779 0.616
DBT 5.758 0.438 2.400 0.512 0.403–0.621 0.213
DLAT 7.112 -0.773 0.213 0.560 0.452–0.668 0.108
DLD 8.911 -7.039 7.690e-7 0.680 0.582–0.779 0.996
DLST 7.689 1.006 7.474 0.753 0.665–0.841 0.490
FDX1 8.511 -6.517 2.184e-6 0.705 0.609-0.800 0.997
LIPT1 7.824 1.733 34.667 0.729 0.636–0.821 0.021*
PDHA1 9.216 -10.999 2.798e-10 0.632 0.529–0.736 0.992
PDHB 10.451 23.697 3.832e + 20 0.777 0.693–0.860 0.992
SLC31A1 7.4360 0.293 1.796 0.608 0.503–0.714 0.629

CRG logistic regression analysis.

CRGs Cuproptosis-related genes, OR Odds ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval

*P < 0.05