Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep;56(3):222–234. doi: 10.15644/asc56/3/1

Table 3. Frequencies of nuclear abnormalities in exfoliated gingival epithelial cells at different time points.

Tested cytogenetic damages Time of sampling
T0 T1 T2
Micronucleus Dentium SuperLine 1 (1.5) 1 (1) 1 (1)
Ankylos 1 (2) 1 (1) 2 (1)
Nuclear buds Dentium SuperLine 0 (1) 0 (1)a 0 (1)a
Ankylos 0 (1) 1 (1)b 1 (1)b
Broken eggs Dentium SuperLine 0 (1) 0 (1) 0 (1)
Ankylos 0 (1) 1 (1) 1 (1)
Binucleated cells Dentium SuperLine 4 (1)A 5 (2)Ba 5 (2)C
Ankylos 5 (2)A 6 (1)Bb 6 (1)B
Karyorrhexis Dentium SuperLine 1 (3) 1 (3) 3 (2.5)
Ankylos 3 (2) 3 (0.75) 3 (3)
Karyolysis Dentium SuperLine 7 (4) 7 (4) 6 (4)
Ankylos 3 (4) 3 (4) 7 (4)
Condensed chromatin Dentium SuperLine 2 (2) 2 (2) 2 (2)
Ankylos 2 (2) 2 (1) 2 (1.25)
Pyknosis Dentium SuperLine 4 (2) 2 (2) 4 (4)
Ankylos 4 (2) 4 (2) 4 (2.25)
Data are presented as median and interquartile range.
*Different upper capital letters indicate a significant difference among the evaluation periods, and different lower-case letters indicate a significant difference among the treatment groups (P < 0.05). Abbreviations: T0, sample before the treatment – baseline; T1, 90 days after implant insertion; T2, 21 days following the healing abutment placement.