Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: Lab Chip. 2022 Oct 11;22(20):3801–3816. doi: 10.1039/d2lc00262k

Table 1.

The state-of-the-art biosensors integrated within MPS.

Sensor Classification Target LOD linear range Probe Advantages/disadvantages Represent reference
Electrochemical Biosensors Amperometric Glucose N/A
0.5-30 mM
Glucose oxidase Relatively mature technology
Fast response
Changes in enzyme activity
Calibration required
42
Lactate N/A
0.5-20 mM
Lactase
Voltammetric IL-6 8 ng/mL
0- 2 μg/mL
Antibody Relatively high sensitivity
Multiplexing
Changes in antibody activity
Relatively long reaction time
Signal saturation for long-term monitoring
22
TNF-α 2 ng/mL
0- 2 μg/mL
Antibody
Impedance CK-MB 0.0024 ng/mL
0.01- 10 ng/mL
Antibody High sensitivity
Regeneratable
Relatively high linear range
Relatively long reaction time
Signal saturation for long-term monitoring
51
GST-α 0.01 ng/mL
0.1- 100 ng/mL
Antibody
Albumin 0.09 ng/mL
0.1- 100 ng/mL
Antibody
Potentiometry pH 59 mV/pH (sensitivity)
5- 8
Polyaniline Easy to configure and cheap
Fast response
Low sensitivity
Limitation in targets
62, 63
Electrical
Biosensors
TEER Electrical resistance N/A None High sensitivity
Continuous monitoring
Relatively high linear range
54, 55
FET CEA 1 fg/ml
10 fg/mL to 1 ng/mL
Antibody High sensitivity
High detection range
High cost
Relatively complex manufacturing process
64
miRNA 0.1 fM
1 fM t0 10 pM
Nucleic acid probe
Optical Biosensors Fluorescence Oxygen NM Silica microparticles Provide temporal and spatial information
Lack portable device
78
SPR Insulin 0.85± 0.13 μg/ mL
0- 100 μg/ mL
Antibody Label-free
Fast response
Relatively low sensitivity
Relatively high cost
93
FRET Calcium NM Fluorescent probe Provide intracellular information
Relatively high sensitivity
Lack portable device
90