Table 2.
Overview of HER2-Low.
Study | Study design | N | IHC 1+ | IHC 2+ | ISH | HER2-Low | Assay |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LA/mUC | |||||||
Fleischmann 2011 | Observational | 150 | 11.4% | 4.7% | n=147FISH+: 8.8%Borderline +: 4.8%FISH-: 86.4% | 13.4% | Dako HercepTest (IHC)Abbott/Vysis PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe Kit (FISH) |
Banerji 2019 | Clinical trial, phase I | 16 | 12.5% | 56.3% | Performed only for 2+ (n=16)ISH+: 11.1%/ISH-: 43.8%ISH unevaluable: 6.3% | 56.3% | N/A |
Weighted average of HER2-Low defined as IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH- or IHC 1+: 17.5% | |||||||
Earlier stage UC | |||||||
Latif 2003 | Observational | 25 | 4.0% | 16.0% | FISH+: 8.0% | 20.0% | Ventana monoclonal anti-human HER-2 protein CB11 (IHC), Vysis (FISH) |
Weighted average of HER2-Low defined as IHC 2+ and ISH/FISH- or IHC 1+: 20.0% |
FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; FISH+, FISH positive; FISH-, FISH negative; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization; ISH+, ISH positive; ISH-, ISH negative; N/A, not available.