Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 21;10:911863. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.911863

Table 15.

A sex and body weight neutral comparison between walking and cycling for commuting purposes.

Age Body weight Speed Time per distance Per cent of maximal heart rate Per cent of maximal oxygen uptake MET Oxygen uptake per time and distance Energy expenditure per time and distance Rated perceived exertion
leg
Rated perceived exertion breathing
years kg km ·h1 min ·km1 % % L ·min1 L ·km1 kcal ·min1 kcal ·km1
Walking 45.2 70 5.8 10.3 62.5 46.0 6.36 1.33 13.7 6.50 67.0 9.70 10.3
Cycling 43.8 70 18.4 3.3 78.0 64.7 8.09 1.98 6.54 9.80 32.3 11.4 12.6
Ratio walking
/cycling
1.03 1.0 0.32 3.12 0.80 0.71 0.79 0.67 2.09 0.66 2.07 0.85 0.82

Calculations are based on average data from the present study of walking and of cycling from Schantz et al. (19). The maximal values for heart rate and oxygen uptake are based on the maximal ergometer cycling test. Rated perceived exertion can be affected by duration of exercise (71, 72). In this case, the mean durations of walking (23.2 min) and cycling (26.2 min) were almost the same.