Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;19(11):1438–1448. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01639-4

Fig. 2. Core innovations of Omnipose.

Fig. 2

a, Comparison of distance field algorithms and corresponding flow fields on ground-truth masks. FMM produces ridges in the distance field resulting from pixelation on the cell mask boundary. Our smooth FIM algorithm minimizes these features. The difference image (FIM − FMM) highlights artifacts in the FMM method. Flow fields are calculated as the normalized gradient of the distance field. Boundary pixelation affects the FMM flow field deep into the cell, regardless of cell size. b,c, Comparison of mask reconstruction algorithms on a smooth flow field. Boundary pixel trajectories and resulting mask outlines from standard Euler integration (b). Trajectories and mask outlines under suppressed Euler integration (c). Red dots indicate the final positions of all cell pixels, not only the boundary pixels for which trajectories are displayed. Bacteria displayed are E.coli CS703-1 (a) and H.pylori (b,c) both treated with aztreonam. Scale bars, 1 μm. Images are representative of 1,299 E.coli and 701 H.pylori cells in the total ground-truth dataset, respectively.