Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 31;53:101715. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101715

Table 3.

Associations between partner-related autonomy constraints and MNH continuum of care outcomes (n = 1886), weighted.

Complete ANC Facility delivery PNC by six-weeks postpartum Infant immunizationa Entire continuum of carea
RC
 No (%) 43.7 56.2 50.2 41.2 18.1
 Yes (%) 39.2 48.0 47.5 29.0 ∗∗ 12.1
 OR (95% CI) 0.83 (0.56, 1.23) 0.72 (0.46, 1.11) 0.90 (0.58, 1.40) 0.58 (0.37, 0.91) ∗ 0.63 (0.37, 1.06)
 aOR (95% CI)b 0.89 (0.62, 1.27) 0.70 (0.45, 1.10) 0.96 (0.62, 1.48) 0.53 (0.34, 0.84) ∗∗ 0.66 (0.39, 1.14)
IPV during pregnancy
 No (%) 43.9 57.5 50.3 40.9 18.0
 Yes (%) 37.9 39.6 ∗∗ 46.7 33.0 13.3
 OR (95% CI) 0.78 (0.48, 1.26) 0.48 (0.31, 0.76) ∗∗ 0.87 (0.54, 1.38) 0.71 (0.46, 1.12) 0.70 (0.36, 1.35)
 aOR (95% CI)b 0.82 (0.51, 1.33) 0.50 (0.32, 0.78) ∗∗ 0.96 (0.60, 1.56) 0.70 (0.47, 1.07) 0.81 (0.43, 1.53)
Lack of partner encouragement of ANC
 No (%) 50.0 62.4 56.4 44.4 20.8
 Yes (%) 19.8 ∗∗∗ 30.9 ∗∗∗ 27.7 ∗∗∗ 23.9 ∗∗∗ 5.6 ∗∗∗
 OR (95% CI) 0.25 (0.17, 0.35) ∗∗∗ 0.27 (0.19, 0.38) ∗∗∗ 0.30 (0.21, 0.43) ∗∗∗ 0.39 (0.28, 0.55) ∗∗∗ 0.22 (0.12, 0.41) ∗∗∗
 aOR (95% CI)b 0.35 (0.25, 0.50) ∗∗∗ 0.43 (0.30, 0.61) ∗∗∗ 0.42 (0.29, 0.60) ∗∗∗ 0.50 (0.34, 0.74) ∗∗ 0.45 (0.24, 0.82) ∗
Lack of partner encouragement of PNC
 No (%) 50.9 63.9 58.0 45.3 21.5
 Yes (%) 14.9 ∗∗∗ 24.1 ∗∗∗ 20.4 ∗∗∗ 19.4∗∗∗ 2.1 ∗∗∗
 OR (95% CI) 0.17 (0.11, 0.25) ∗∗∗ 0.18 (0.13, 0.26) ∗∗∗ 0.19 (0.12, 0.28) ∗∗∗ 0.29 (0.20, 0.43) ∗∗∗ 0.08 (0.04, 0.18) ∗∗∗
 aOR (95% CI)b 0.24 (0.16, 0.36) ∗∗∗ 0.25 (0.17, 0.37) ∗∗∗ 0.26 (0.17, 0.39) ∗∗∗ 0.41 (0.27, 0.62) ∗∗∗ 0.16 (0.07, 0.35) ∗∗∗
Combined lack of partner encouragement
 Encouragement of Both ANC and PNC (%) 54.0 66.6 60.3 46.9 23.3
 Lack of Encouragement of ANC or PNC (%) 25.7 39.5 35.3 29.9 5.6
 Lack of Encouragement of ANC and PNC (%) 10.9 ∗∗∗ 18.3∗∗∗ 15.4 ∗∗∗ 15.1 ∗∗∗ 2.6 ∗∗∗
 OR (95% CI) 0.29 0.33 0.36 0.48 0.19
 i. Lack of Encouragement of ANC or PNC (0.21, 0.41) ∗∗∗ (0.23, 0.47) ∗∗∗ (0.25, 0.52) ∗∗∗ (0.34, 0.69) ∗∗∗ (0.10, 0.36) ∗∗∗
 i. Lack of Encouragement of ANC and PNC 0.10 (0.06, 0.19) ∗∗∗ 0.11 (0.07, 0.18) ∗∗∗ 0.12 (0.07, 0.20) ∗∗∗ 0.20 (0.12, 0.33) ∗∗∗ 0.09 (0.03, 0.22) ∗∗∗
 aOR (95% CI)b
 i. Lack of Encouragement of ANC or PNC 0.37(0.27, 0.52) ∗∗∗ 0.46(0.31, 0.69) ∗∗∗ 0.46(0.32, 0.66) ∗∗∗ 0.53(0.35, 0.80)∗∗ 0.30(0.16, 0.57) ∗∗
 i. Lack of Encouragement of ANC and PNC 0.16 (0.09, 0.29) ∗∗∗ 0.19 (0.12, 0.30) ∗∗∗ 0.18 (0.11, 0.30) ∗∗∗ 0.30 (0.17, 0.54) ∗∗∗ 0.23 (0.09, 0.59) ∗∗

OR/aOR from svy: logistic regression model.

p-value ∗<0.05; ∗∗<0.01; ∗∗∗<0.001; bold indicates p < 0.05.

RC = reproductive coercion; IPV = intimate partner violence; ANC = antenatal care; PNC = postnatal care.

a

Among women with infants still living at six-week interview (n = 1824).

b

Adjusted for urban/rural residence, parity, education.