Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 8;11(21):3969–3981. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4724

TABLE 3.

Treatment

Characteristic All Schedule A Schedule B
Induction cycles
Median 4 4 4
Range 1–9 1–8 1–9
Maintenance cycles
No of patients (%) 16 (37.2) 12 (52.2) 4 (20)
Talazoparib/carboplatin
No of patients (%) a 6 (13.9) 4 (17.4) 2 (10)
Median cycles 2 3.5 2
Range 2–9 2–9 2–2
Talazoparib monotherapy
No of patients (%) a 13 (30.2) 9 (39.1) 2 (10)
Median cycles 8 15 10
Range 1–63 1–63 2–18

Dose modification at MTD

(No of patients, %)

Ever 27 (96.4) 14 (93) 13 (100)
During induction 27 (96.4) 14 (93) 13 (100)
Chemotherapy dose reduction 27 (96.4) 14 (93) 13 (100)
BMN dose reduction 1 (3.5) 1 (7) 0 (0)
Induction % dose intensity at MTD (mean, SD) b
Carboplatin 91 (9) 93 (7) 89 (10)
Paclitaxel 68 (17) 69 (18) 68 (17)
BMN 92 (20) 89 (24) 94 (14)

Supportive care

(No of patients, %)

Growth factor 15 (34.8) 11 (47.8) 4 (20)
Any transfusion 14 (32.5) 6 (26.1) 8 (40)
pRBC transfusion 12 (27.9) 6 (26.1) 6 (30)
Platelet transfusion 2 (4.6) 0 (0) 2 (10)
Reason for treatment discontinuation (No of patients, %)
Disease progression 26 (60.4) 14 (60.8) 12 (60)
Adverse event 5 (11.6) 3 (13) 2 (10
Intercurrent illness 3 (6.9) 1 (4.3) 2 (10)
Death on study 1 (2.3) 0 (0) 1 (5)
Study completion/transition to commercial drug 2 (4.66) 2 (8.7) 0 (0)
Other 6 (13.9) 3 (13) c 3 (15) d
a

Patients who received both talazoparib/carboplatin and subsequent talazoparib monotherapy maintenance are reported in both groups.

b

Percent of full dose based on number of induction cycles.

c

Schedule A (one patient each): Physician's decision, Patient not tolerating therapy, and Switched to alternative treatment.

d

Schedule B (one patient each): Refused further treatment, late determination of eligibility, and treatment held for more than 3 weeks.