Table 3.
Hierarchical Regression Analyses Examining the Associations between BPF and Adaptive Voting and Liking
Variables | B | SE B | St. β | p | R2 | R2Δ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Adaptive Voting | |||||||
| |||||||
Step 1 | Gender, task engagement, and co-occurring psychopathology | .052 | -- | ||||
| |||||||
Gender | 0.109 | 0.071 | 0.141 | .128 | |||
Task engagement | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.115 | .213 | |||
Depressive symptoms | −0.005 | 0.003 | −0.154 | .135 | |||
Social anxiety symptoms | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.035 | .735 | |||
| |||||||
Step 2 | BPF | .084 | .032 | ||||
| |||||||
Gender | 0.121 | 0.071 | 0.156 | .090 | |||
Task engagement | 0.040 | 0.032 | 0.116 | .205 | |||
Depressive symptoms | −0.001 | 0.004 | −0.021 | .861 | |||
Social anxiety symptoms | 0.004 | 0.009 | 0.044 | .668 | |||
BPF | −0.031 | 0.016 | −0.227 | .050 | |||
| |||||||
Adaptive Liking | |||||||
| |||||||
Step 1 | Gender, task engagement, and co-occurring psychopathology | .036 | -- | ||||
| |||||||
Gender | 0.043 | 0.066 | 0.062 | .521 | |||
Task engagement | 0.048 | 0.030 | 0.149 | .119 | |||
Depressive symptoms | −3.63*10−4 | 0.003 | −0.013 | .904 | |||
Social anxiety symptoms | −0.007 | 0.008 | −0.091 | .400 | |||
| |||||||
Step 2 | BPF | .039 | .003 | ||||
| |||||||
Gender | 0.046 | 0.067 | 0.066 | .492 | |||
Task engagement | 0.048 | 0.031 | 0.150 | .117 | |||
Depressive symptoms | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.028 | .827 | |||
Social anxiety symptoms | −0.006 | 0.008 | −0.087 | .423 | |||
BPF | −0.009 | 0.015 | −0.073 | .541 |
Note. Adaptive voting: each participant’s correlation between acceptance votes received from each co-player and acceptance votes cast for that co-player; adaptive liking: the correlation between co-player acceptance votes and participants’ liking ratings of the co-player. Gender was coded with 0=male and 1=female.