Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 6;22:1141. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10278-z

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Prognosis score of risking patterns of the CLRM in the TCGA dataset. A1 Kaplan–Meier living profiles of OS of patients in high- as well as low-risking parts of entire dataset (A2) Distribution of CLRM-based risking value. A3 Distinct modes of living condition as well as living time among both groups. A4 The express criterions of CLRM for every patient presented by the clustering analysis heatmap. B-C Relevant results of the training part and testing part